Pubdate: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 Source: Statesman Journal (OR) Copyright: 2003 Statesman Journal Contact: http://www.statesmanjournal.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/427 Author: Julia Silverman, The Associated Press Cited: Drug Enforcement Administration ( www.dea.gov ) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/Conant (Walters v. Conant) Photo: Activist Robert Walker of Brookings hopes that a Supreme Court ruling on medical marijuana will reassure Oregon doctors that discussing pot with their patients is OK. OREGON CONSIDERS EFFECT OF MARIJUANA RULING Officials Think That The Ruling May Encourage More Doctors To Discuss The Drug With Patients. PORTLAND -- Tuesday was a busy morning for Brookings resident and activist Robert Walker, better known to hundreds of his fellow medical marijuana patients in the state as Brother Bob. His phone rang constantly with news of a big, and somewhat unexpected, court win: U.S. Supreme Court judges had turned away an appeal by the Bush administration to punish doctors who recommend medical marijuana to their patients. Walker rejoiced at the news and hoped that it would reassure more Oregon doctors, especially those in rural areas, that discussing pot with patients wouldn't automatically lead to a knock on the door from a federal agent. "I am going to go out and start recruiting doctors," he said, detailing a county-by-county crusade he hopes to launch in the next month. "They've been afraid the federal government will take their license and ruin their whole livelihood." Oregon medical and government representatives agreed that the high court's decision might help persuade some doctors to more readily talk about the drug with their patients. But they said that it probably won't bring an onslaught of new pot prescriptions because, they say, a decent percentage of Oregon doctors already are willing to discuss the drug with patients. Oregon doctors have been allowed to recommend the drug for specific maladies including cancer, glaucoma, HIV or AIDS, severe pain or nausea, seizures or muscle spasms since a voters backed a medical marijuana initiative in 1998. An Oregon doctor cannot prescribe marijuana. But to participate in the state's medical marijuana program, a patient must have a statement from a physician stating their qualifying medical condition and affirming that pot might help them feel better. According to the Department of Human Services, 1,093 doctors have written such notes, of the 10,028 physicians that are currently registered with the state board of medical examiners. That's only 10 percent -- but that's counting pediatricians, dermatologists and other specialists to whom patients seeking a medical marijuana card would not turn, said Jim Kronenberg, spokesman for the Oregon Medical Association. When they are ruled out, the percentage of doctors who already feel free to discuss marijuana with their patients likely is much higher, he said, and to his knowledge, none have run afoul of federal agents. Kronenberg said it probably is easier to find a doctor who will discuss medical marijuana west of the Cascades, especially in Portland, Eugene and the Medford area, and that the Supreme Court's decision might have more impact in rural Oregon. Kevin Neely, a spokesman for Attorney General Hardy Myers, called the ruling, "a setback for all efforts to undermine the program in the courts." But he said the ruling does not affect ongoing law enforcement battles over marijuana cultivation. Twice in the past year, Drug Enforcement Administration officials have seized marijuana cultivated in Oregon for medicinal uses, saying they are enforcing federal law. - --- MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart