Pubdate: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 Source: Emory Wheel, The (Emory U, GA Edu) Copyright: 2003 The Emory Wheel Contact: http://www.emorywheel.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2781 Our Opinon -- A resolution DRUG TESTING AT EMORY TAKES A NEW TURN Last week, the contentious issue of pre-employment drug testing here at Emory was put to rest. In a unanimous vote, the University Senate passed a resolution curtailing Emory's year-old drug testing policy, revising its scope to include only "safety-sensitive jobs." These positions include, but are not limited to, operators of heavy equipment, drivers of university vehicles, campus security agents and health care professionals. In March of 2002, the administration of former University President William M. Chace surprised the campus by announcing that Emory would become one of three universities in the nation to require all potential staff employees to submit a "successful" urinalysis. The policy was a public relations fiasco, sparking an uproar from the Employee Council, the Carter Center and an overwhelming majority of students. Part of the problem that precipitated such a strong response from the Emory community was the behind-closed-doors manner in which Chace enacted the policy. The administration bypassed both the University Senate and the Employee Council and simply informed both groups that Emory would now test every staff applicant for drug use, evidently with no concern for any collaborative input. In political terms, this is known as a slight. In academic terms, it's known as monological. To students, it just seems crazy. When University President James W. Wagner arrived two months ago, he strongly indicated that he wanted to honor the decisions of his predecessor, but would rely more heavily on the Senate for guidance on the question of pre-employment drug testing. Determined not to construe the impending policy change as an out-with-the-old, in-with-the-new scenario, Wagner's political conscience has wisely compelled him to let the Senate draft a new recommendation that will make all parties content, instead of taking matters into his own hands and simply dictating a new policy. Last semester, the Senate passed a recommendation that proposed two changes to the drug testing policy. The first is mirrored by last week's recommendation, in which drug testing is resigned to "safety-sensitive jobs." The second proposed change was legally problematic. It permitted individual departments to choose whether to require pre-employment drug testing, allowing for a hypothetical situation in which the College requires a urinalysis for its staffers while the Facilities Management Division does not. When the recommendation was passed and presented to Chace, he apparently did not collaborate with the Senate to discuss the potential legal issues raised by a drug testing policy that condones inter-departmental discrimination. In other words, where Chace had failed to communicate his ideas to the Senate, the Senate failed to communicate its ideas to Chace, and the result was deadlock. This time around, things were done differently. Kent Alexander, Emory's general counsel, and Mike Mandl, Emory's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, were kept in the loop as the Senate constructed a new draft for a drug testing compromise. This time there would be no surprises from either the president or the Senate, and by the time a recommendation was passed, the president was ready and waiting to accept it. Thanks to improved communication between the president and the Senate, the general expectation is that a new drug testing policy will be implemented by the start of the new school year. The compromise represents both a victory for civil rights at Emory and the first sizable political victory for Wagner, who played his cards perfectly in defusing the political timebomb left by his predecessor. The story of Emory's pre-employment drug testing policy has finally reached its conclusion, and we consider it a happy ending. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens