Pubdate: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 Source: Star-News (NC) Copyright: 2003 Wilmington Morning Star Contact: http://www.wilmingtonstar.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/500 Author: Todd Volkstorf, Staff Writer Note: This report contains information from The Associated Press Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine) N.C. COCAINE CHARGES STILL PROSECUTED AS FELONIES For now, simple cocaine charges still will be prosecuted as felonies in North Carolina, despite a recent Court of Appeals ruling that the same charges are also misdemeanors. The Supreme Court on Thursday issued a stay on the ruling in response to a request by State Attorney General Roy Cooper that the decision not be allowed to become law. "For the safety of our communities, it is important that possession of cocaine remain a felony," Mr. Cooper said via e-mail. "I am pleased that the court issued this stay so that prosecutors and law enforcement can continue their fight against drugs while the case is being decided." The Appeals Court ruling comes from the Forsyth County case, State v. Norman Jones. In it, Mr. Jones pleaded guilty to possession with the intent to sell and deliver cocaine, which then classified him as a habitual felon. Mr. Jones then appealed and won. The court ruled that state statutes conflict on whether simple possession of cocaine is a felony or misdemeanor. "The practical effect of the ruling is everyone we've convicted could argue that they were guilty of a misdemeanor because the statute is ambiguous," said Jon David, New Hanover County assistant district attorney. "That's why the Supreme Court acted so quick," he said. District Attorney John Carriker said felony cocaine charges have been successfully prosecuted since they were upgraded from misdemeanors. Since the law was changed, the three judges on the Court of Appeals are the only people who believe the charge of cocaine possession is a misdemeanor, Mr. Carriker said. It's a felony, he added, and it will be prosecuted as one. It's remains to be seen how the Supreme Court will decide to interpret the ruling, which could affect thousands of cases across the state. The state legislature might have to rewrite the law, removing the ambiguity. Or the Supreme Court could strike down the appellate court's ruling. Mr. David questioned how people could be punished under a statute that isn't clearly written. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake