Pubdate: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 Source: Oklahoman, The (OK) Copyright: 2003 The Oklahoma Publishing Co. Contact: http://www.oklahoman.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/318 Author: Ben Brown Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/prison.htm (Incarceration) ALTERNATIVES TO BUILDING ANOTHER COUNTY JAIL Building a new $200 million county jail because of overcrowding will do little to address the fact our prisons and jails are quickly becoming holding cells for people with mental illness and substance abuse problems. The New York Times on Nov. 1 reported that American prisons and jails contain three times more mentally ill people than do psychiatric hospitals. Substance abuse may be an even bigger problem. A study conducted at the Oklahoma County jail in 2000 found that approximately 70 percent of those arrested tested positive for drugs at the time of arrest. If testing had been done for alcohol as well, those figures undoubtedly would have been even higher. Jails are not equipped to provide the same services as mental health or substance abuse treatment facilities. Without adequate medication, counseling or other services, many people with mental illness or substance abuse problems never receive treatment for the root cause of their behavior. We can pour millions of dollars into jails and prisons every year and still not address the true issue. Treat the prisoners in the Oklahoma County jail who have mental illness or substance abuse problems, and plenty of jail cells will open up. A task force to study Oklahoma's high female incarceration rate recently found that when funding for substance abuse treatment goes up, the need for incarceration goes down. High-incarceration states such as Oklahoma spend much less on state-supported alcohol and drug treatment programs. Oklahoma is near the bottom of the list, spending an average of $6.06 per capita for such programs, compared with a national average of $13.17. In spite of a lack of resources toward this end, Oklahoma is striving to provide more cost-effective ways to treat people with substance abuse and mental illness. One example is the drug court program, overseen by the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services. Drug courts, an alternative to incarceration for certain nonviolent drug offenders, offer a highly structured, district court-supervised substance abuse treatment program at an average annual cost of $5,000 per year, per person, compared with a minimum of $17,000 for sending the same person to prison. Drug courts also reduce the rate at which people re-offend when compared with those who serve out their entire sentences. Another successful example is the Oklahoma County mental health court, which just celebrated its first birthday and is one of only a handful of such courts nationwide. Mental health courts are an alternative to incarceration for people with a diagnosed mental illness -- schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or severe depression -- who are charged with a misdemeanor or nonviolent felony. In time, the mental health court could save Oklahoma taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, with savings averaging approximately $15,000 per year per defendant. More importantly, it offers more dignified treatment for people with mental illness in the justice system. Both of these programs prove there are more efficient, cost-effective ways to benefit the taxpayer and the person who needs help. So before we think about spending yet another $200 million in taxpayer money on a new county jail, let's think about other alternatives to incarceration that work. Brown is deputy commissioner of the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin