Pubdate: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 Source: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (Canada Web) Copyright: 2003 CBC Note: The decisions: R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/rec/html/2003scc074.wpd.html R. v. Clay http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/rec/html/2003scc075.wpd.html Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/David+Malmo+Levine Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Chris+Clay Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Victor+Caine Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Philippe+Lucas SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS MARIJUANA LAW OTTAWA - The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that possession of marijuana will remain a criminal offence until the government decides to change the law. The highest court has rejected the appeal of three B.C. men who argued it is unconstitutional to use the law to punish a harmless activity. The court ruled 6-3 that making marijuana possession a criminal offence does not violate Charter of Rights guarantees of liberty and security of person. Lawyers for the three B.C. marijuana users - David Malmo-Levine, Chris Clay and Victor Caine - had argued that the government has no right to tell people what they can put in their bodies. Malmo-Levine is a Vancouver marijuana activist has fought for 10 years to legalize marijuana. He arrived at the court in May, admitting to reporters that he had taken a few tokes of the drug before making his argument to the court. However, the top court rejected his argument and agreed with lawyers for the federal government who maintained that the law should be upheld and that Parliament should set drug policy for the country. They challenged the assertion that the effects of marijuana are benign - - with a report that connects use to a number of problems including driving accidents, psychiatric disorders and drug addiction. Prime Minister Paul Martin said last week that the government will reintroduce a marijuana bill that died in November when Parliament was prorogued. The bill would decriminalize the activity, which means people caught with small amounts would face fines rather than prison. A Victoria medical marijuana advocate says the Supreme Court made the wrong decision, and says Tuesday's ruling won't make society any safer. It's a great early Christmas present for the black market and for the criminal gangs involved in cannabis distribution because this guarantees their lock on profits for the holidays, " says Philippe Lucas of the Vancouver Island Compassion Society. Lucas says possession of small amounts of pot is bound to become a major issue in the next federal election. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake