Pubdate: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 Source: Calgary Sun, The (CN AB) Copyright: 2003 The Calgary Sun Contact: http://www.fyicalgary.com/calsun.shtml Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/67 Author: Bill Kaufmann Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/grant.htm (Krieger, Grant) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/gateway NO TOKEN APPROVAL GIVEN Supreme Court Of Canada Decision On Pot Wins Cops' High Approval While Activist Stews City police are cheering and a local marijuana activist is jeering a Supreme Court of Canada ruling yesterday upholding the illegality of possessing small amounts of pot. By a 6-3 vote, the court turned down three separate cases challenging the criminal prohibition on cannabis possession, ruling such a ban is constitutional. It's now up to the federal government to decide whether or not to follow through on its pledge to decriminalize simple possession. "We conclude that it is within Parliament's legislative jurisdiction to criminalize the possession of marijuana ... equally it is open to Parliament to decriminalize ..." said the court's judgment. A local crusader for medicinal marijuana said the judgment is a setback for those bidding to possess marijuana to alleviate painful symptoms. "Doctors still aren't being able to prescribe it, so sick people are still forced to go to the black market or people like me," said Grant Kreiger, who supplies marijuana for therapeutic reasons. "That's the only choice we have and the government will penalize us every chance it gets." While Kreiger said he still hopes Prime Minister Paul Martin's Liberals will ease penalties, he said the court's decision sends a disappointing message. "The courts have taken two steps back -- they haven't done anything for anyone, not even the sick," he said. But a spokesman for city police said the ruling sends a welcome signal. "Some people look on marijuana possession (as less serious) than others do -- it has health dangers and can be a gateway drug," said Insp. Brian Skeet of the organized-crime unit. "This decision solidifies the constitutionality of the existing law we've been operating on -- it needs to remain a criminal offence." The SCOC also ruled 9-0 in upholding the criminality of possession for the purpose of trafficking. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin