Pubdate: Thu, 13 Feb 2003
Source: Dallas Observer (TX)
Copyright: 2003 2000 New Times, Inc.
Contact: http://www.dallasobserver.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/884
Author: Jim Schutze
A TALE OF TWO PITIES
Hill felt sorry, Bolton felt nothing over fake drugs
Three weeks ago I get a call from an old friend who also happens to be a
friend of the police chief. He reminds me that I wrote positive things
about Terrell Bolton in 1999 when he was made chief of police in Dallas,
and he says Bolton wants a lunch.
I say sure. Of course. Lunch, always. He's the chief, I'm a reporter. Why
wouldn't I go?
But I wonder why he wants to. Bolton just got done refusing to talk to the
Dallas Observer when Thomas Korosec was working on a comprehensive story
about him ("Dallas' Chief Problem," January 16). This, in spite of the fact
that Bolton received more positive ink from the Observer than from any
other news outlet in Dallas, at least in his first couple of years as chief.
My friend said Bolton hoped I would tell him why the Observer keeps doing
stories about him. Because I did not want to put my friend in dutch, I
thought I needed to warn him what I would say at such a luncheon. I told
him the big reason we do stories on Bolton is because Bolton is what we in
journalism call "The Chief of Police."
I also told my friend if you assigned a team of Harvard professors to come
up with the Observer's political slant, they would all end up walking off
the job. Our slant is to sell newspapers--well, give them away,
actually--by putting good stories in the paper that people will read. Our
favorite way to do that is by stirring up stuff.
I told my friend all of that, and guess what? No lunch, apparently. Now I
can't even get my friend back on the phone. I put a call in to Bolton
through his P.R. lady. She said he was out of town. But all of this brings
us to what I think is a much larger point--that Bolton is a man who really
does not understand how things work.
The single worst abuse of civil rights in the recent history of the city
was the fake-drugs scandal a year and a half ago, still under investigation
by the FBI. The Dallas Police Department and the Dallas County district
attorney were sending Spanish-speaking Mexican immigrants to prison on
wholly fabricated drug charges.
These defendants, mechanics many of them, came up from Mexico with nothing
in their pockets and started businesses and put their kids in school and
bought houses. They are the modern version of the Puritan Pilgrims, but our
police department and district attorney treated them as if they were not
fully human.
The Observer has given both Bolton and Dallas County District Attorney Bill
Hill some pretty good lambastings over the fake-drug issue. The lambasting
of Hill--the part I did, anyway--was based on a belief that Hill had been
completely obdurate and callous. As it turns out, there were some things
going on behind the scenes--processes I could not see and nobody chose to
tell me about--indicating that Hill wanted to do the right thing, once he
saw what was going on.
In February 2002, the Dallas Hispanic Bar Association wrote both to Chief
Bolton and to Hill telling them it felt it was "in the unique position of
understanding the issue of the legal community, the law enforcement
community and the Hispanic community at large" and offering its support.
Hill got the message, which was, "We are a bunch of substantial Hispanic
citizens who are very disturbed by the fake-drug scandal and want to talk
to you." Hill assigned a Hispanic staff member, Assistant District Attorney
Dan Benavides, to contact the group and arrange a series of meetings with
Hill. Those meetings took place and are still taking place, according to
Benavides and several members of the Dallas Hispanic Bar Association with
whom I spoke.
The DHBA told Hill and Benavides that the fake-drug scandal was having an
unintended but serious impact on hundreds of first-time and minor
defendants. The fake-drug scandal happened because the district attorney
prosecuted people without testing the drugs. The cops were turning over
fake drugs in order to make their cases.
The subsequent political outcry was for all seized drugs to be tested. But
the county's budget for drug testing is limited. Instead of taking days for
test results to come back from the lab, now it takes as long as several
months. The legal process, meanwhile, is stopped: Under new rules adopted
after the scandal erupted, all drugs must be tested; defendants cannot even
plead guilty until the results get back; and according to both Benavides
and the DHBA, people who would have been able to plead or at least bond out
of jail in a few hours or a day before the scandal are now languishing in
jail for months.
DHBA member Al Silva, a civil lawyer and a former assistant district
attorney in California, said: "The reality is that for folks that are in
the pokey, who know that what they had was cocaine, who know it's going to
be tested positive, and yet who could plead guilty today and get out of
jail, it is a curse to have to wait for that test to come back."
The political outfall from the fake-drug scandal for Hill was clear: He
needed to make sure all seized drugs were tested in order to show he wasn't
allowing any more fake evidence. Silva and other DHBA members with whom I
spoke, as well as Benavides, said it was clearly understood in the meetings
with Hill that allowing people to waive their test results might backfire
on Hill politically: It could look as if he were setting up a way to
railroad more innocent people. In spite of that, Hill has agreed in
principle to a waiver, according to Benavides.
People I talked to on both sides said the policy for handling these waivers
is still a work in progress, with a close eye on how to avoid abuses by the
district attorney's staff or by bad defense lawyers. (I called Hill himself
for comment but did not hear back.)
The point the DHBA people make is that Hill is doing what they ask, even
though it could come back to bite him politically. For that reason, the
Hispanic lawyers I spoke with all argued that Hill has shown courage and
integrity.
Contrast: The DHBA never heard back at all from Bolton. Not a word. Not a
memo. Not a phone call. Michelle Wong Krause, a member of DHBA who was
involved in the process, said of Bolton's failure to respond to DHBA's
letter: "I am so mad. I really think that should be made public. I am just
appalled that he would not give us the time of day. We're not just some
fly-by-night organization. We have been around 20 years representing the
Hispanic lawyers."
She personally made a follow-up call to see why they had not heard back on
the letter, but not even that drew a response. "Nothing. Not a single
response. Not a call. Not even an underling saying, 'Sorry, we're under
investigation, so we can't say anything.' He completely blew us off, and I
think that was so irresponsible of him. To me that's so arrogant. It's like
he just didn't care."
I called Bolton's administrative staff and spoke with his administrative
assistant and a desk sergeant who opens the mail, even faxed them a copy of
the DHBA letter, trying to get them to tell me if the chief ever saw the
letter. Later I asked Janice Houston, Bolton's $95,000-a-year public
relations person, about the letter. She said Bolton didn't think he
remembered seeing the letter but couldn't be sure.
The net effect of Korosec's Bolton story was devastating: Other law
enforcement officials, lawyers and office-holders who have dealt with him
painted him as a pariah, a liar, a bullshit artist and a horrible
administrator who has surrounded himself with dumbasses.
Clearly in response to the piece, Bolton put together something called a
"Police Academy for the Media," during which I guess the chief was going to
wow all of the 40 or so media people who attended with his stellar
personality. Instead he made outrageous comments about how he wants to
torture and abuse arrested persons who have not been convicted of a crime.
There was no off-the-record agreement for any of this. But when Houston
figured out that her boss had said something embarrassing, she tried to
argue it would be unfair for the press to report his remarks, because they
had been his guests.
Sheesh.
He is the city's first black chief. He is hardly the city's first black
public official. In the past 20 years, Dallas has seen African-American
city managers, a mayor, many council members, a county commissioner and
countless other civic and business leaders--maybe not enough, but a lot.
And as we should expect, those African-American leaders have broken on the
same percentage lines as white and Latino leaders between brilliant, so-so
and no-good. Whoever hands that stuff out, they don't do it on the basis of
skin tone.
But Bolton has wrapped himself in skin tone. He behaves as if he were the
first black man ever to hold an important position in this town, and he has
repeatedly suggested that any effort to oppose him is racial. He threatens
racial unrest in the city over every personal slight, even the city
manager's failed attempt to save the city $95,000 by eliminating Houston's
job and moving her to another post.
I wanted to see that one. I wanted to see the sound trucks rolling through
African-American neighborhoods: "The city manager's proposed cutback will
reduce Janice Houston's annual compensation from $95,000 a year to less
than $60,000. Take to the streets now!" I mean, exactly how far down can
you grind the civil rights movement in order to pour it into your own pocket?
Prediction: When he does finally get out of town--and it is going to
happen--he will threaten racial unrest if the contract with Mayflower
Movers fails to include bubble wrap for his crystal.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom