Pubdate: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 Source: Capital Times, The (WI) Copyright: 2003 The Capital Times Contact: http://www.captimes.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/73 Author: Dave Zweifel Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/ashcroft.htm (Ashcroft, John) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Ed+Rosenthal (Rosenthal, Ed) WHERE'S THAT STATE'S-RIGHTER ASHCROFT NOW? When John Ashcroft was in the U.S. Senate he was always a champion of state's rights. Too much power is held in Washington. State government is closest to the people. Now that he's the attorney general, the states are wondering where he's gone. The message is clear from his U.S. Department of Justice: We feds know best. The glaring example is Ashcroft's love affair with the death penalty. He recently overruled 28 local federal prosecutors who had decided not to seek the death penalty in 28 cases and he has used federal prosecutions to override state laws such as the use of marijuana for medical purposes and Washington state's right-to-die law. The most glaring example of that occurred recently in California. Ashcroft's prosecutors went after a man who had a state license to grow marijuana for medicinal purposes. The federal judge in the case refused to let the jury know that he had a state license. He was convicted and faces five years in the federal penitentiary. Those who keep an eye on the Justice Department are struck by the irony that former Attorney General Janet Reno, a supposed "big government" Democrat, yielded to state's rights more readily that the once unyielding state's rights man Ashcroft. Ashcroft's concentration of more power in Washington isn't confined to drug cases and the death penalty, however. Those who have seen a draft of his so-called "Patriot Act II" are struck by its concentration of more power in the Justice Department, superseding many state laws, all supposedly necessary for the war against potential terrorists. The current Patriot Act has been under fire from civil libertarians for its sweeping changes to traditional American safeguards on detention and prosecution. Patriot Act II is "breathtaking," some who have seen a draft of it say. The act, which will be introduced in a few weeks, could declare individuals, not just groups, "foreign powers" subject to clandestine surveillance and would permit surveillance against a U.S. citizen suspected of spying for a foreign power, even if the suspicious conduct was not itself criminal. Additionally, according to an alert from the American Society of Newspaper Editors, the act would repeal key provisions of the venerable United States Freedom of Information Act, allowing the government to keep secret much more information than it already does. Names of people detained in connection with terrorism investigations would be exempt from FOIA provisions, for example. In other words, some folks might disappear overnight and you'd never be able to find out where they went or why. Indeed, these state's-righters turn into very different people when you give them power in Washington, D.C. The question is, can we survive them? - --- MAP posted-by: Josh