Pubdate: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 Source: Charleston Gazette (WV) Copyright: 2003 Charleston Gazette Contact: http://www.wvgazette.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/77 Author: Christopher Tritto, Staff writer Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) AMBULANCE BOARD TO DEBATE DRUG POLICY Kanawha County Emergency Ambulance Authority board members plan to revisit the debate over whether to subject their employees to random drug testing. But few at the authority appear inclined to change current policy. Board member, and County Commission president, Kent Carper placed the issue on the agenda for the authority's meeting March 28. No drug-related incidents spurred the decision to reconsider random tests, he said. "I don't think we have a problem," Carper said. "I have great confidence in the personnel over there. I just want to ask the questions that need to be answered." The county has a zero-tolerance policy, but does not administer random drug tests. "If random tests would benefit our service, we'd implement it," said Joe Lynch, authority director. "I don't really think it would." Supervisors can call for "probable cause" tests if an employee shows signs of drug use or strays from protocol on ambulance runs, Lynch said. "It's been used multiple times, and the test results have always come back clean," Lynch said. "One employee refused a test and resigned nearly 10 years ago. Otherwise I am not aware of any incident." John Burdette, the authority's medical director, said shift commanders and lieutenants observe ambulance workers closely. Burdette and others regularly review run reports, he said. In his six years as medical director, he's never seen a positive drug test, he said. "To date we don't have any kind of evidence that switching to random testing would improve safety," Burdette said. "I would like to see some evidence rather than just opinion." In contrast to the county, Charleston City Council expanded a random drug test policy that went into effect in January 2002. All city employees with commercial drivers licenses or who work in "safety sensitive" positions, such as police, firefighters and ambulance staff, are subject to random tests for marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, opiates and PCP. Human resources administrators also pre-screen city job applicants and require tests after accidents. In 2002, contracted technicians from Health Research Systems-EMSI conducted 557 total drug tests on Charleston employees. Of those workers, 16 tested positive, said Judy King, the city's director of human resources. City employees who test positive for drugs may undergo treatment and counseling programs at their own expense and then retest to get a second chance at their jobs. "About 95 percent of those underwent counseling and treatment and returned to their jobs," King said. "A minimum of six follow-up tests are given to them over the following year." Should the county ambulance board members approve random testing, Lynch said he hopes they would include a "second chance" policy, like the one in Charleston. Ambulance work is extremely stressful, and people make mistakes, he said. Carper said he would support a "safe harbor" policy, which would let ambulance employees seek treatment once and retest before they are fired for drug abuse. - --- MAP posted-by: Jackl