Pubdate: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 Source: Dallas Morning News (TX) Copyright: 2003 The Dallas Morning News Contact: http://www.dallasnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/117 Author: Ruben Navarrette, The Dallas Morning News Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/prison.htm (Incarceration) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?118 (Perjury) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/corrupt.htm (Corruption - United States) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/racial.htm (Racial Issues) CONVICTION NO LONGER A SIGN OF GUILT The criminal justice system in Texas has lost some of its swagger. While those living in other parts of the country still operate under the notion that one is innocent until proved guilty, here in the Lone Star State, frankly, we no longer are sure who is innocent and who is guilty. They aren't sure in the Texas Panhandle town of Tulia, where a judge has recommended that the state Court of Criminal Appeals overturn the convictions of 38 drug defendants - most of them African-Americans - because they were based solely on the testimony of a white officer the judge deemed "simply not a credible witness under oath." It didn't help that the undercover man, Tom Coleman, also worked alone, kept scant notes and had a foul habit of tossing about the "n-word." Nor are they sure in the "Big D." It has been almost 16 months since Dallas Police Chief Terrell Bolton admitted that what police thought were bricks of cocaine seized as evidence in drug cases actually turned out to be ground Sheetrock. Prosecutors dismissed 86 drug cases and released dozens of defendants - all of them Mexican immigrants or legal residents - with not so much as a lo siento mucho (I am very sorry). Yet it still isn't clear who is to blame for the big scandal in the Dallas Police Department. In fact, the more time that passes, the fuzzier the picture becomes. One reason for that is Chief Bolton. The chief has first-rate survival skills, and he seems far less interested in finding out what went wrong than in saving his skin. That is why he didn't launch an internal investigation - despite earlier claims that he had - in deference, he says, to an interminable FBI probe. (A Justice Department spokesman told me several months ago that local police don't necessarily have to defer to the feds.) Chief Bolton did find it necessary, however, to go before a group of Mexican-American officials a few months after the scandal broke. There - according to several who were in the room - the chief tried to reassure the group that the press was on a witch hunt and that the entire affair had been blown out of proportion. Stories like that help convince me that Chief Bolton has at least two convictions - that he should be police chief and that he shouldn't have to vacate the office until he is good and ready. And so it seems what we have in Dallas is a remorseless cop who finds injustice easier to tolerate than unemployment. Yet Chief Bolton isn't the only city official willing to treat as minor inconveniences the fact that people were wrongly imprisoned, that scores of lives were wrecked and that Mexican immigrants who don't speak English have been marked as "easy prey" for every manner of bad guys, con men and scoundrels. The Dallas City Council also has been reluctant to comment on the case. And that may be because - according to one council member - there is real disagreement as to whether Chief Bolton should be fired or even disciplined. The council member claims that her Hispanic and African-American colleagues are protective of the city's first black police chief and the man who supervises him, Ted Benavides, the city's first Hispanic city manager. I recently confirmed as much during candidate interviews conducted by The Dallas Morning News editorial board in advance of the May 3 election. There is at least one public official who doesn't share the minority council members' support for Chief Bolton and the department. Dallas County District Attorney Bill Hill recently has given several interviews in which he confessed his growing distrust of the department and doubts about Chief Bolton's credibility. The roots lie in what Mr. Hill claims was the delay by police in filling his office's request for documents related to the fake drug cases. He also told the editorial board that he doesn't believe much of what he hears coming out of the department these days. Anyone still think this is just about a bunch of Mexican immigrants tossed in jail on trumped-up drug charges? That would be enough in my book. But even if it isn't enough in yours, here is something to chew on. Police and prosecutors are partners in crime fighting. And, one imagines, it must be mighty hard for prosecutors to build cases and put criminals in jail when they aren't 100 percent sure that what police are telling them is the truth. The same lesson applied in Tulia. And make no mistake, until these sorts of wrongs are corrected, the rest of us never again can be sure about distinguishing guilt from innocence. - - Ruben Navarrette Jr. is an editorial columnist for The Dallas Morning News. - --- MAP posted-by: Jackl