Pubdate: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 Source: Herald-Dispatch, The (WV) Copyright: 2003 The Herald-Dispatch Contact: http://www.herald-dispatch.com/hdinfo/letters.html Website: http://www.hdonline.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1454 Author: Ronald Fraser REDUCING PRISON COSTS CAN SAVE W.VA. TAXPAYERS MILLIONS Gov. Bob Wise's projected $250 million budget deficit is due in part to the cost of confining 3,000 people in state prisons. To cut prison costs -- and avoid the appearance of being soft on crime -- some states are turning to dead-end fixes. Other states, however, are counting on alternatives to incarceration to reduce prison costs. The cost to keep each West Virginia inmate behind bars is $47.78 a day, or $17,000 a year. Add in other operating and capital costs, and you get a prison bill of $77 million a year. What to do? Illinois cut inmate education programs to save $5 million a year. Minnesota is charging inmates room and board, and Iowa prisons now serve desserts only once a day. Against huge budget shortfalls, these measures are fiscal dead-ends. States that really want to reduce prison costs are adopting policies that cost less than locking people up. Smart prison strategies come in three varieties: - -- Early Release -- Kentucky's governor gave 567 nonviolent inmates an early release from prison to ease his budget woes. A similar step that would cut a year off each sentence in West Virginia could save as much as $9 million. - -- Sentencing Reform -- Michigan's former Republican governor John Engler signed into law a bill repealing the state's mandatory minimum sentencing laws for drug crimes, a step that is already reducing the number of nonviolent, first-time offenders going to jail and could save $41 million in 2003. North Carolina, Connecticut and other states are making similar changes. In West Virginia, every 1,000 offenders not incarcerated for a year would cut the budget deficit by $17 million. - -- Treatment instead of jail -- Texas, Oregon, California, Idaho and Arkansas use drug treatment to greatly lower prison costs. Since about 80 percent of prison inmates have serious drug and alcohol problems, this strategy has great potential for reducing budget deficits. In California, treatment programs could send 24,000 fewer persons to prison each year. Spending taxes upfront to prevent problems can significantly cut costs later on in state run corrections, health, education and welfare programs. An Oregon study found for every dollar invested in treating inmate substance abuse, taxpayers eventually save about $5 in future costs. Effective treatment programs cost about $3,500 per year. But tax savings during the first year after a person successfully completes a treatment program can be enormous: $5,000 in reduced crime costs; $7,300 in reduced arrest and prosecution costs; and, for West Virginia, $17,000 in reduced incarceration costs. Each citizen or inmate who completes a state-sponsored treatment program and then avoids a future run-in with the law, could save taxpayers at least $29,000. For every 1,000 citizens and inmates successfully completing these programs, future West Virginia budget deficits could be reduced by $29 million. Leaders in Charleston can continue to raise taxes to incarcerate nonviolent offenders. Or they can use smart sentencing policies, coupled with treatment and prevention programs, to cut both prison costs and taxes. - --- MAP posted-by: Alex