Pubdate: Mon, 12 May 2003 Source: Peak, The (CN BC) Copyright: 2003 Peak Publications Society Contact: http://www.peak.sfu.ca/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/775 Author: Pete Lypkie DRUGS: HARM REDUCTION THE BEST SOLUTION, U.S. ADVOCATE SAYS Vancouver's drug policy is on the right track, says Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the New York-based Drug Policy Alliance. Nadelmann, who wrote the book Cops Across Borders and is sometimes called the "Drug Anti-Czar," addressed Canadian and American drug policies and proposed changes to Vancouver's approach to drug use at Simon Fraser University's Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue last Tuesday. The harm reduction advocate stressed the importance of Vancouver's success, saying that the United States government had a tremendous interest in seeing Vancouver fail so the city would not provide an example of available alternatives. "Vancouver is the first major outpost of the European sort of thinking . . . of pragmatic, science-based, public health driven, compassion-oriented drug policy," Nadelmann said. Nadelmann asserted that current drug policies are rooted in racism and other forms of discrimination. According to Nadelmann, drug use tends to be demonised when it is perceived to be a problem of black people or people living in poverty, instead of middle-class white people. One example he cited was the acceptability of white women using opiates during menopause in the 1950s. This was followed by the inappropriateness of using opiates when other drugs became available for that purpose. Views on opiates changed because of perceptions about the racial and economic groups who used them. Harm reduction strategies, Nadelmann maintained, are the way to solve our drug problems. "The challenge is not to get rid of drugs . . . but to accept the fact that drugs are here to stay," Nadelmann said. "We must learn to live with drugs so that they cause the least possible harm and the most possible benefit." In evaluating the effectiveness of drug policy, he said the wrong question is, "How many smoke or inject some drug?" According to the harm reduction advocate, the better question is, "Did cumulative death, disease, and crime go up or down?" The U.S. government's focus on abstinence, he said, prevents them from solving their major drug problems. Nadelmann claimed that safe injection sites and heroin maintenance programs are win-win situations for both police and drug users, because they remove the incentive for crime and high black market prices, and respond to the myriad health risks associated with using dirty needles in the unsterile conditions of back alleys. After his talk, Nadelmann participated in a one hour question and answer period with the audience, moderated by the CBC's Kathryn Gretsinger. Audience members challenged Nadelmann on a variety of topics. Several people were concerned with the affect of new drug policies on Canada-U.S. relations, especially considering their differences concerning policies on other issues, such as national security. Nadelmann compared the current predicament to the historical situation of slavery. When the U.S. pressured Canada to return escaped slaves, Canada decided not to give in because it was unjust. He said Canadians should do the same today and look to science-based plans for reducing harm rather than the U.S. methods of spending large amounts of money on ineffective enforcement and abstinence campaigns. Others discussed controversial so-called drug courts that operate separately from the regular court system. Such a system is used in many countries to provide alternative sentencing options to people convicted of drug offences. Nadelmann commented that it is important to consider whether drug courts try to absorb treatment programs into the criminal justice system or if they allow offences to be treated as a social problem outside of the justice system. His main concern was that people's progress be evaluated according to their health and safety, rather than their production of drug-free urine samples. Finally, Nadelmann stressed the importance of progress on these issues, since the death rate from non-therapeutic drug use far exceeds the death rate from SARS. Our society, he said, is much more willing to put time and effort into preventing the latter, while under-valuing deaths due to drug use. - --- MAP posted-by: Alex