Pubdate: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 Source: Business In Vancouver (CN BC) Copyright: 2003 BIV Publications Ltd. Contact: http://www.biv.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2458 Author: Gordon Price Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?142 (Safe Injecting Rooms) COPS IN LIMBO AFTER COUNCIL REJECTS REQUEST FOR CASH Was that budget cutting or knee-capping? When city council, without discussion, refused to ante up the $2.3 million the police had requested to continue the drug crackdown in the Downtown Eastside, it sent a message. But what was it? Does council want to wait and see whether such policing reduces drug dealing on the streets or merely moves it somewhere else? Is it saying that enforcement should not be seriously undertaken until the other three pillars are in place? Is it telling the police to make do with what they've got? Or, no matter what, council doesn't believe policing will help solve the drug problem and the resources should be funneled into safe-injection sites and treatment - none of which the city has said it will pay for. So far we've seen no serious implementation of two pillars (treatment and harm reduction), token recognition of the third (education), refusal of funding for the fourth (enforcement) and no discussion of the fifth (legalization), which may be the next pillar the advocates have on their agenda. Given the lack of debate, council has an obligation to be clear about what it wants from the police. It has to be explicit about what constitutes success. And it really should come to grips with the implications of the four-pillar strategy. Specifically, who is expected to supply the drugs, particularly crack? The dealers or the government? What behaviour will be tolerated? Is it OK to inject and smoke drugs in public? Will other distribution points evolve into Main and Hastings? (Is that what is happening now at Seymour and Helmcken and at Dunsmuir and Seymour?) If the object is to get drugs off the streets, will the police be expected to allow the deals to take place inside bars and hotels, at marijuana cafes, by dial-a-dope? Or will dealers be allowed to supply users inside the safe-injection sites? If none of the above, then what are the police expected to accept and what do they enforce? It's unfair and dangerous to leave the police uncertain about their role. I saw what happened when the rules evaporated around street prostitution in the early 1980s. The police effectively gave up and neighbourhoods were expected to fend for themselves. Public officials, by refusing to act, said essentially they were no longer in the business of peace, order and good government. That's not a viable long-term strategy, particularly when you're expecting to play host to the world. Don't forget two other factors. The mayor is committed to an inquiry into the missing-women investigation, where no doubt the police will be under excruciating examination. They may not be overly inclined to cooperate with city hall's low-cost wish-list. And given the possibility of marijuana decriminalization, we can expect even more widespread distribution and public use of drugs, and even more money flowing through this expanding part of the economy. To allow the rules to be set by the drug users and dealers themselves, with the police left without specific instructions or adequate resources, is inviting trouble. Price tags With all the new development in Downtown South (or, as the realtors prefer, Upper Yaletown), we're finally getting some good mid-rise buildings in among the towers: Architect Bryce Rositch's Beresford at Davie and Homer, Foad Rafii's sloped-roof annex for the Domus further up Homer at Helmcken and Wiens-Suzuki's eccentricity at Drake and Richards. If you want to get a sense of the emerging character of Vancouver's newest neighbourhood, do a quick comparison of the 1200-blocks of Homer and Richards streets. You'll see from the former the value of serendipity, of having a few leftover buildings from previous eras to add a little variation to the streetscape. - - On the other side of the peninsula, developer Bruce Langereis and architect Jim Hancock should be rightfully proud of the Carina, standing proudly above the new water-filled piazza at Harbour Green Park. It's a new Vancouver icon, with its full-sail facade, muted colours (not green!) and the lively rhythm of its townhouses. It may be the best tower in a decade. - - Acknowledgment, as well, to a new and nifty outdoor advertising campaign. Carat Canada created the "Seven Stages" - from Ritual to Renewal (via Despair) - for the Adidas Vancouver International Marathon seen on bus shelters and banners. Clever. But what was MacLaren McCann West thinking when it created GM's ad that characterized transit users as "Creeps and Weirdos"? - - Speaking of grass, the non-smokable kind, it's nice to see it being planted on the boulevards of the new high-density districts. It says, hey, this is a residential neighbourhood! But in some cases, they're getting a little muddy. Neighbouring buildings might want to be, well, more neighbourly by laying down a few slabs of slate or granite as stepping stones, while still keeping the green relief, the permeable soil and the opportunity to do some special landscaping in the future. That's what gives Vancouver its special character. Correction On Congestion It's Week Six since London introduced congestion charging and things continue to go better than even the advocates expected. Traffic has been reduced by 20 per cent and delays cut by nearly 30 per cent. Delays to buses caused by congestion are down by half. As a result, bus passenger numbers are up by 14 per cent. The only problem: the system is not making as much money as expected because volumes aren't as high as anticipated. I made a mistake in my last column when I noted that the cameras used in London were made by a Richmond firm. Not so: they come from Extreme CCTV Inc., based in Burnaby. Which raises the question: If the system works so well and the technology is locally developed, why aren't we considering it here? - --- MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager