Pubdate: Mon, 26 May 2003 Source: Berkshire Eagle, The (MA) Copyright: 2003 New England Newspapers, Inc. Contact: http://www.berkshireeagle.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/897 SENSE AND FOLLY IN THE DRUG WAR Add Canada to the list of countries the Bush administration is mad at for poor reasons. This time it's conflicting policies on illicit drugs. Long an advocate of controlling drug abuse through treatment and education instead of punishment, Canada is wisely experimenting with new means for combating the social harm caused by illegal mind-altering drugs. One initiative in the works, decriminalizing the possession and use of small amounts of relatively harmless marijuana, has the Bush anti-drug Cossacks up in arms, with heightened security measures being talked about along our northern borders. In the age of al-Qaida, it is boneheaded for the administration to spend as much as a dime on protections against pot smokers in Manitoba. Yet Bush drug czar John P. Walters has joined with Attorney General John Ashcroft and Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge in decrying the Canadian proposal, which Parliament is expected to pass. Mr. Walters said relaxed marijuana laws up north could lead to a flood of marijuana heading south -- as if pot isn't already readily available to the average American consumer. Mr. Walters has also labeled "immoral" the city of Vancouver's "safer injection sites" for heroin addicts. Based on a successful Swiss model, the Vancouver clinics are staffed by nurses who dispense clean needles, swabs and sterile water. This cuts down on AIDS and other diseases and brings addicts into a setting where they can be encouraged to enter treatment programs. Mr. Walters termed the Vancouver approach "state-sponsored suicide." His answer is to throw drug addicts in jail. Mr. Walters also shares the Bush administration's disdain for Canada's humane policy on the medical uses of marijuana, which distinguishes between what in some cases is self-destructive behavior and the alleviation of suffering among the seriously ill. It's not that the Canadian government is indifferent to the family and social harm that often accompany drug addiction. Canada, however, means to do what works, not simply maintain a cruel and demonstrably ineffectual multi-million-dollar drug-enforcement and incarceration industry. Among the many U.S. anti-drug devices that have failed, according to a new federally financed study, is drug testing in schools. A study of 76,000 high-school students found that young people whose schools do regular random testing of students do not have less drug use than schools that don't test. In declaring student drug-testing constitutional, the Supreme Court ruled in 1995 that privacy rights were trumped by the need to deter substance abuse among the young. The "efficacy of this means [drug testing]" was "self-evident," according to Justice Antonin Scalia. Self-evident to Mr. Scalia, but not borne out by the facts. Perhaps Canada's approach to drugs is so alarming to the Bush administration because it may finally expose the U.S. approach as wasteful, inhumane, unworkable, ridiculously expensive and otherwise bankrupt. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens