Pubdate: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 Source: Port Perry Star (CN ON) Copyright: 2003 Port Perry Star Co. Ltd. Contact: http://www.portperrystar.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2533 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) IS NEW LEGISLATION HALF BAKED? There are a number of schools of thought on the current move by the federal government towards decriminalizing the simple possession for personal use of marijuana. Some see it as the end of civilization, and some see it as the final awakening of our society to the simple reality of the war against so-called soft drugs. And, there are a million other interpretations in between. But what we may be seeing is another move by the federal government down the slippery slope of legislation without preparation. They are considering changing the law to make simple possession a non-criminal offense, but providing or selling would still be a jailable offense. The feds have, in effect, decriminalized the user but not the provider. This could, in fact, be the first official indication from the federal government and its justice agencies that they have given up... that they have lost the war in this country against marijuana. But, if we as a society, after a national referendum or other method, decide as a whole that possessing or consuming marijuana or other cannabis products is just not as bad as we once believed (and that is a big if) then should the next move not be to set up parameters for its use and distribution? Should we not see that taxation on the product goes directly towards the battle against hard drugs like crack and heroin, a war perhaps our police forces might win? Should much of the funds not go to health care? We are not legalizing marijuana in Canada, we are decriminalizing it just as has been done in several states in the United States. But what are we really telling society? Aren't we telling them that marijuana is alright? Is that what we want to tell them? If not, then we are simply amplifying the problem. If the answer is yes, then why are we taking half-measures? Perhaps the government should ask us first, then act. - --- MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager