Pubdate: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 Source: Las Vegas Review-Journal (NV) Copyright: 2004 Las Vegas Review-Journal Contact: http://www.lvrj.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/233 Author: Ed Vogel, Review-Journal Capital Bureau Cited: American Civil Liberties Union ( www.aclu.org ) Cited: The Committee to Regulate and Control Marijuana (CRCM) http://www.regulatemarijuana.org/ Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/props.htm (Ballot Initiatives) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/marijuana+initiative Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis) RULING SOUNDS PETITIONS' DEATH KNELL CARSON CITY -- A court decision Wednesday probably ends the chances of groups trying to place petitions legalizing marijuana and throwing out the $833 million tax increase on the Nov. 2 ballot, their leaders said. "It looks like this legal decision has shut us out," said Jennifer Knight, communications director of the Committee to Regulate and Control Marijuana. "Without those signatures, I think it is over," said tax opponent George Harris, chairman of Nevadans for Sound Government. "We are done." They made the comments after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected an appeal by the marijuana committee to count signatures on its petition that were rejected by the secretary of state's office. The committee wanted voters to pass a constitutional amendment that would legalize an ounce or less of marijuana for adults. Their proposal, which needed voter approval in November and in 2006, also would have provided for harsher penalties for vehicular manslaughter and delivery of marijuana to minors. Knight had counted on 2,039 additional signatures to put her petition over the 51,337 minimum to qualify for a spot on the ballot. Even with additional signatures, Harris' referendum would have been 1,601 signatures short of qualifying, according to the secretary of state's office. Harris did not join in the appeal, but hoped a favorable ruling meant his rejected signatures would be counted. Knight said her organization's office in Las Vegas will remain open for the next two days while it's determined whether other legal options exist. She said they might ask the court to rehear the case with more judges participating in the decision. Only three were involved in the Wednesday ruling. "These people signed the petition with full faith they would be counted. The fact they weren't counted is a travesty of democracy," Knight said. "All it does is disenfranchise people," added Gary Peck, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, whose organization joined in the appeal. The marijuana committee had appealed District Judge James Mahan's decision that barred election registrars from counting signatures of some newly registered voters. Only registered voters can sign petitions. Some people registered to vote and then signed the petition. But their voter registration applications were not mailed or given to election workers for processing until later. Therefore, it appeared they signed the petition before they became registered voters. Mahan said state law stipulates that registrars should only count signatures of newly registered voters whose applications were turned in the day they signed petitions, or postmarked on the day they signed petitions. In a 2-1 decision, Appeals Court Judges Thomas Nelson and Andrew Kleinfield held that law does not restrict free speech. "What it restricts is the power of persons not registered to vote to change the laws passed by the voters' duly registered representatives," they said. They noted in some instances voter registration applications might "never be mailed or delivered." In a dissent, Judge Harry Pregerson said the law prevents people from signing petitions if they registered to vote in the evenings, on holidays and on weekends. He noted that in three of Nevada's 17 counties signatures are counted regardless of when voter registration applications are postmarked or delivered. Peck said the problem could have been avoided if there had not been "an utter lack of leadership and consistency" by the secretary of state's office. But Deputy Secretary of State Renee Parker said the ACLU and Knight are blaming them for problems they caused themselves. She said the marijuana petition probably would have been on the ballot if the committee had not misplaced boxes holding 6,000 signatures. "That was the reason they failed," she said "They had a responsibility to turn in signatures on time and not to lose petitions." In making the ruling, the appeals court did not consider two other decisions made by Mahan. He also threw out a requirement that petition circulators in Nevada secure signatures in 13 of the state's 17 counties equivalent to 10 percent of the voters in the last general election. Mahan also tossed out the law that petition circulators must secure an affidavit from one of signers of their petitions. In the affidavit, the signer must swear other signatures are genuine and come from registered voters. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake