Pubdate: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 Source: Charlotte Observer (NC) Copyright: 2004 The Charlotte Observer Contact: http://www.charlotte.com/mld/observer/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/78 Author: Jeffrey Collins, Associated Press PRISONS HEAD SEEKS FLEXIBLE SENTENCING To Cut Crowding, Bill Proposes Alternatives to Incarceration for Some COLUMBIA - Corrections Director Jon Ozmint says his agency needs alternatives to prison for some nonviolent offenders and greater flexibility on cutting sentences for good behavior. The alternatives are needed in part because lawmakers will not keep giving the prison system more money even though South Carolina will finish 2003 with 1,100 more inmates than the year before, Ozmint said. On behalf of Ozmint, House Speaker David Wilkins and three other lawmakers have prefiled a bill that would allow nonviolent offenders serving less than five years in prison to be eligible for programs like house arrest, electronic monitoring or daily supervision. In an opinion article published Dec. 27, in The (Columbia) State, Ozmint said alternative sentences have been successful in new drug courts across the state. "This would be an entirely new idea in sentencing, giving offenders a 'real prison' experience first, while offering an opportunity to advance to an alternate form of incarceration," Ozmint wrote. Ozmint decided on the proposal after considering what lawmakers would accept in this session. "This is just the first step," Ozmint told The Associated Press on Friday. Other ideas Ozmint set aside for now include cutting sentences for nonviolent inmates who get high school diplomas. The current proposal would expand good behavior credits that can shorten sentences to more inmates, while giving prison administrators more power to issue or take away the credits. Violent offenders, which make up about half of all inmates, would not be eligible for the alternative sentences, and the new policy on time for good behavior would not effect anyone serving a life sentence. "The enactment of this legislation should result in a gradual, but slight reduction in the growth of our inmate population in a manner consistent with public safety considerations," Ozmint wrote in the newspaper opinion article. The Corrections Department will end this year with more than 24,000 inmates -- an increase of 2,500 prisoners in three years -- and requires a budget of close to $300 million, Ozmint wrote. The agency ran a $21 million deficit last fiscal year and has lost more than $70 million in funding since the state's budget woes began about four years ago. On one side, the budget constraints have made S.C. prisons the second-most efficient in the nation, with spending at about $12,300 per inmate per year. On the other side, Ozmint and his predecessors have slashed so much the director has said there is almost nothing left to cut. The proposals reverse a get-tough trend in South Carolina of harsher sentences. "We've painted all our felons with the same brush for some years," said Senate Corrections and Penology Committee Chairman Mike Fair. "But there is some validity to treating violent and nonviolent offenders differently." Greenville Republicans Fair and Wilkins expect the bill to get serious consideration when the legislature reconvenes this January. Democrats calling for a change from the "lock them up and throw away the key" mentality likely will support the measure, too, said committee member Sen. Kay Patterson. Republicans "haven't had a change of heart," said Patterson, D-Columbia. "They just know they don't have any more money to keep locking people up." Violent offenders need to stay in prison, Patterson said. But he has never seen a reason to keep nonviolent criminals in prison for long periods. "That just hardens them up," Patterson said. Another provision of the law would allow prison officials to restore some good behavior credits to inmates who lose them because of misbehavior. Also, inmates who commit "a particularly meritorious act" that prevents or lessens an attack on an employee or other person can have up to 180 days shaved off their sentences, according to the bill. But the bill has a few sticks to go along with the carrots. If a court determines an inmate is filing frivolous lawsuits, the credits can be taken away. Prisoner advocates appreciate the moves, but also want changes made to a parole system that rarely releases offenders until they finish their sentences, said Lillian Swanson, director of the S.C. chapter of Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants, a prison reform group. Swanson said she also wishes prison officials would not treat all violent inmates alike. "There are many so-called violent criminals that are neither violent or much of a threat to the community," she said in an e-mail. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake