Pubdate: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 Source: Reporter, The (Fond du Lac, WI) Copyright: 2004 Gannett Wisconsin Newspapers Contact: http://www.wisinfo.com/thereporter/contactus/readerservices/letter_to_editor.shtml Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2271 Website: http://www.wisinfo.com/thereporter/index.shtml Author: Darold A. Treffert, M.D. Note: Darold A. Treffert, M.D., of Fond du Lac, is past chairperson of the Controlled Substances Board and Medical Examining Board of Wisconsin. LAW ALLOWS MEDICAL MARIJUANA IN CAPSULE FORM The Reporter recently carried a story that Rep. Greg Underheim plans to introduce legislation to make "medical marijuana" available for treatment of some medical conditions. That legislation is premature, and is not necessary. First, medical marijuana is now already available by prescription in Wisconsin. It is Marinol - (dronabinol) delta-9-THC, the active ingredient in smoked marijuana - a Schedule II substance that any Wisconsin physician can prescribe for several medical conditions including nausea and vomiting from chemotherapy in cancer patients. It is in capsule form, standardized as to quality and dose, and is taken orally which is a much more reliable delivery system than smoking; no other approved drug uses smoking as a delivery system. The good news with respect to Marinol is that since the onset of action is slow and gradual it is only weakly reinforcing, and it produces dysphoria rather than euphoria, so abuse potential is very low. While it is not always effective, Marinol is a beginning effort to make alternatives available in otherwise refractory patients with certain conditions. Second, the research Mr. Underheim recommends is already underway. The most respected and dispassionate recommendations regarding medical marijuana appear in the 1999 National Academy of Science Institute of Medicine report advocating research on cannabinoids, both synthetic and plant derived, to determine which of those substances are possibly effective for which conditions with the goal of developing, if effective, a rapid onset, reliable and safe delivery system for those substances. The DEA agrees, stating that the question of whether marijuana has a legitimate medical purpose should be determined by good science and evidence-based, rather than belief-based, determinations. Centers have now been established such as the University of California Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research to seek reliable and dispassionate answers to safety and efficacy of cannabis and its compounds to assess which of those are possibly effective for which medical conditions. Similar research is underway in a number of other settings as well so the $2 million in new money Mr. Underheim says is not available for research here in Wisconsin is not necessary. Regrettably, legitimate inquiry as to the possible role of cannabinoids in the treatment of some medical conditions continues to get "hijacked" in a bait-and-switch agenda toward legalization of marijuana for recreational use with all of its accompanying risks. I have seen too much damage in too many patients, particularly children and adolescents, from use and abuse of marijuana to approach the legalization question too casually lest we do the wrong thing for the wrong reasons. I support, as does the Wisconsin Medical Society, further research into the possible role of cannibinoids in the treatment of some medical conditions. The research Mr. Underheim says he can support, as a compromise, is already underway and we should await those results - objective, unbiased, non-political and with no hidden agendas--before proceeding further, reasonably and rationally, in this important, but conflicted, area. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake