Pubdate: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 Source: Red Deer Advocate (CN AB) Copyright: 2004 Red Deer Advocate Contact: http://www.reddeeradvocate.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2492 Author: Jim Taylor THOUGHTFUL DIALOGUE ABOUT DETOX CENTRE IN ORDER The coincidental appearance of two "drug" stories on the front page of the Advocate last Friday may offer an opportunity to begin a thoughtful dialogue about addictions and how Red Deer will respond to this problem in our midst. The smaller story, which I shall comment on first, consisted mostly of negative reaction to the proposed location, the Scott Block, for the detox centre/shelter which I am charged with bringing into existence for the Safe Harbour Society. This story followed on the heels of a similar negative article printed with big headlines the previous day. As part of a delegation from the Safe Harbour Society holding consultations with neighbours of our proposed centre, I had heard the opposing opinions expressed earlier in the week. I also heard a tremendous amount of anger and frustration about the existing situation in the alley behind the Scott Block, and frequent expressions of resentment about the methadone clinic down the street which is perceived as contributing to the problem. The merchants' frustration is entirely understandable. They have invested substantial money in their businesses and in their hopes to revitalize the downtown core; they justifiably see the drug use and drug dealing that goes on in the alley behind them as a blight on the downtown and a detriment to their businesses. Unfortunately, our proposal to locate a detox centre/shelter in the Scott Block has become a lightning rod for merchants' frustration with the "big city problems" that already exist around them in the downtown. No doubt if our centre was already in operation, we would be blamed, like the methadone clinic, for "attracting" the problem. But we can't be blamed now: we aren't there and the problems are. The "big" story on Friday's front page had a bold headline asking: Winning the war on drugs in city? and a sub-headline that stated: Police believe summer campaign has scared dealers away. This story dealt with increased police drug enforcement, a dramatic increase in the number of drug charges laid, and the relatively insignificant amount of drugs being found in recent busts. The small amount of drugs being seized and an eight per cent decrease in property crime over a year ago, were attributed to drug dealers being "scared away" by stepped-up police activity. Although, at first glance this story may not appear related to the previous one, a closer look at the circumstances behind both stories shows that they are intimately connected. First let me thank the police for their increasing vigilance in pursuing drug dealers and congratulate them on their success in doing it. Secondly, let me suggest that there is another factor at play in the crime statistics that needs to be taken into consideration: the existence of the often-maligned Central Alberta Methadone Program. Methadone treatment allows persons with addictions to replace an illegal addictive drug, purchased at high-cost from drug dealers, with an alternative, non-intoxicating addictive drug - methadone - legally obtained at low cost and used with medical supervision. As more persons with addictions enter the methadone-treatment program, they remove from the drug marketplace the demand for the illegal drugs they were using before they began treatment. Fewer drugs on the streets, fewer dealers, and reduced property crime are exactly the results you would predict from the controlled and successful operation of a methadone treatment program, and these are precisely the findings of Friday's main front-page story. Unfortunately, even though many people become sick of the addicted lifestyle and seek to escape it through detox and treatment or through methadone maintenance, there seems to be an unlimited supply of new individuals from every socioeconomic class willing to experiment with severely addictive drugs. Sadly, many of these experimenters will get hooked and become the next generation of addicts needing detox and treatment. Like methadone maintenance, shelter and detox represent the means whereby some of these lives, shattered by addiction, can be reclaimed, and individuals restored to health and productivity. The challenge for the community is finding the best location for this to take place. With our proposal, the Scott Block will undergo a substantial building upgrade, costing around $300,000, and the Gaetz Avenue streetscape will be much enhanced with an attractive new retail space in the front of the building. The alley behind the Scott Block will be made safer because of improved lighting and the presence of staff on duty 24 hours per day. There are many other merits to our proposal and good reasons why it fits in the Scott Block. Suffice it to say that agencies providing services in the downtown to persons with drug or alcohol addiction are part of the solution to Red Deer's addition problems; they are not part of the problem. Much of the problem downtown is created by bars that are too big, that sell too much booze to too many people and then turn them out on the street in large numbers at the same time. The drug dealing that goes on inside some of the bars, and in their parking lots is another facet of the same problem. Untreated mental illness and homelessness are also contributing factors. In Friday's detox centre story, one very vocal opponent is quoted as believing there is "more (drug) activity on the street," and implies that it is somehow connected to the methadone clinic. Yet the "big story" about drugs on the same page completely refutes that belief. Similarly, before it was built, there were many dire predictions from neighbouring merchants about the John Howard Society's proposed half-way house in the old Park Hotel. Yet, in Saturday's Advocate, police were quoted as stating: ". . . there have been no complaints from neighbouring retailers about that facility." It may be the case once again that "fear of the unknown" is causing a negative misperception about what our centre will mean for Gaetz Avenue. I think it was Mark Twain who said: "It ain't the things ya don't know that get ya into trouble, nearly so much as the things you know - that ain't so." In terms of how and where to best respond to problems associated with addictions in Red Deer, let the dialogue begin. * Jim Taylor is Project Development Manager for the Safe Harbour Society. The opinions expressed are his own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the board of the Safe Harbour Society. - --- MAP posted-by: Josh