Pubdate: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 Source: Montreal Gazette (CN QU) cdde623-9956-4909-aeff-c8c434653cd6 Copyright: 2004 The Gazette, a division of Southam Inc. Contact: http://www.canada.com/montreal/montrealgazette/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/274 Author: William Marsden, The Gazette Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?188 (Outlaw Bikers) TWO HELLS ANGELS BIKERS MAY FACE $11-MILLION FINE Elite Members To Be Sentenced Monday. Amount Reflects Cocaine And Hashish Profits Funnelled Through Account In 2000, Court Told Crown prosecutors will seek $11 million in fines against two top Hells Angels recently convicted of conspiracy to commit murder, drug trafficking and gangsterism. Prosecutors claim the amount reflects drug-trafficking profits earned in 2000 by Walter (Nurget) Stadnick, 51, and Donald (Pup) Stockford, 42. Prosecutors will also seek forfeiture of the convicted men's homes, vehicles, furniture and jewelry, and a total of $34,000 in cash. Their homes are in their spouses' names. But the Crown will claim these are just fronts. Crown attorney Randall Richmond told Quebec Superior Court Justice Jerry Zigman yesterday in Montreal that the Crown will make arguments next week for what would be the largest criminal fine in Canadian history. The Crown "will present a request for a fine in lieu of monies in the Gertrude account," Richmond told the court. He was referring to financial records taken from the Hells Angels drug-trafficking accounts. They show that in 2000, Stockford and Stadnick earned more than $11 million in cocaine and hashish profits as part of a Hells drug consortium called La Table. The money went through an account code-named Gertrude belonging to the two Hells Angels, who were part of the elite Nomads chapter in Montreal. Both men are from Hamilton, Ont. Persuading the court to levy a fine on the full amount rests on whether the Crown can show all $11 million came from drug trafficking, and that the money has disappeared and is impossible to seize. The law allows the government to impose fines equivalent to criminal profits. Still, prosecutors have had mixed success. The Quebec Court of Appeal reduced one $150,000 fine on drug profits to $20,000, claiming the law allows the government to obtain fines only in lieu of net profits. In other words, a drug dealer has a right to deduct his expenses and losses. Judges have also been reluctant to impose fines greater than the offender's capacity to pay. In the case of Stadnick and Stockford, the Crown will argue that all $11 million represents profits from a criminal enterprise and therefore that amount should be reflected in the fine. Zigman said yesterday he will sentence the two bikers at noon on Monday. The Crown is seeking a 24-year prison term for each offender. The defence is asking for 13 to 15 years. Defence lawyer Maureen McGuire argued yesterday her clients should also receive enhanced credit of up to 3.1 years for every year they have served awaiting trial. In other words, almost nine years would be automatically deducted from their sentences. She also said Stockford should get credit for the two months he was out on bail because he had to endure curfews and the mental stress of reporting daily to police. "This posed considerable limitations on the freedom of an individual," she said. "I can tell you, that submission didn't find a sympathetic ear," Zigman told her. She also wanted the lifetime ban on possession of firearms reduced to 10 years. That didn't garner much support, either. "He (Stadnick) needs weapons when he gets out of jail?" Zigman asked. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D