Pubdate: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 Source: Globe and Mail (Canada) Copyright: 2004, The Globe and Mail Company Contact: http://www.globeandmail.ca/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/168 Author: Kirk Makin Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/areas/toronto Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/corruption POLICE CHIEF DENIES 'BLUE WALL OF SILENCE' IN CORRUPTION PROBE Toronto Police Chief Julian Fantino moved to clamp a lid on a massive police corruption scandal yesterday as new questions erupted about the way police, prosecutors and the judiciary dealt with the unprecedented scope of the alleged misconduct. Chief Fantino played down evidence of threats, widespread perjury and theft among his drug officers and contradicted statements that his force met internal investigators with hostility and non-compliance. "I don't think there is a blue wall of silence, and I can't speak to the hostility," Chief Fantino said. "The way things have been portrayed -- as if there is widespread corruption -- that's not the case at all." The internal task force found evidence of wrongdoing by 17 members of the central field command drug squad. However, Chief Fantino stressed that only six were charged with offences, including conspiracy to obstruct justice, perjury, extortion, theft and assault causing bodily harm. Toronto Police Association lawyer Gary Clewley said the head of the task force, RCMP Chief Superintendent John Neily, "had a stake in justifying a mega-investigation that costs millions of dollars. I'm not saying he was padding, but I am saying he was squeezing every bit of juice out of the lemon." But lawyers for some alleged victims of police misconduct said the internal investigation failed to root out all the wrongdoing on the force, and the need for a full public inquiry has escalated. "What has really happened here is a few cops have been singled out to take the heat for a much broader problem," civil litigator Peter Biro said. "It's a way for the chief to say that it is an isolated problem." Mr. Biro and criminal lawyer Edward Sapiano said the disturbing reality remains that many officers engaged in misconduct that simply fell short of supporting criminal charges. "I will not be content until other branches of the justice system step up to bat and acknowledge their responsibility," Mr. Sapiano said. He said the Department of Justice showed "willful blindness" by staying some charges, but not others, as the allegations and suspicion multiplied. "I can't imagine that anyone would reasonably think that was the case," said James Leising, a senior Justice Department official. Mr. Leising said the task force notified him if "credible evidence" turned up to indicate wrongdoing by a police officer. "We took the right course."The corruption story caught fire when, after a three-year battle by The Globe and Mail and CBC, affidavits written by Superintendent Neily were unsealed, revealing allegations that rogue officers falsified search warrants, traded in drugs, supplied perjured testimony and shook down citizens. However, the affidavits in effect exonerated an entire unit of the drug squad based on four complainants having refused to co-operate with investigators. Mr. Biro yesterday took issue with that, saying that two of the complainants are his clients and that they did everything they could to help. He said the pair, a married couple, accused police officers of emptying a major portion of their savings from a safety deposit box during a raid. They were scheduled to be interviewed by a task-force investigator last February, but the interview was cancelled, rescheduled and then cancelled again. "I expressed shock, to say the least," Mr. Biro said. "The explanation provided was that there was a certain amount of time in which to complete their investigation and only a certain amount of resources to dedicate, that they had to focus on the best or strongest cases. "Now, you have people saying this crew has a clean bill of health because no charges were laid," he said. "That is absolutely shocking to me." Mr. Biro said the investigators were dedicated but lacked true independence because they answered to Chief Fantino.In the Ontario Legislature yesterday, New Democratic Party Leader Howard Hampton predicted that the courts will have to deal with "an avalanche" of applications to reopen drug cases. An already overstrained court system will be hard pressed to deal with the additional workload, Mr. Hampton said. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin