Pubdate: Sat, 16 Oct 2004
Source: Santa Fe New Mexican (NM)
Copyright: 2004 The Santa Fe New Mexican
Contact:  http://www.sfnewmexican.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/695
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/Colombia
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/Plan+Colombia
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?236 (Corruption - Outside U.S.)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?203 (Terrorism)

OUR TROOPS IN COLOMBIA? YANQUIS COME HOME!

While Iraq remains the Bush administration's most tragic misuse of our 
military against terrorism, the Republican Congress is compounding a 
minitragedy of its own making:

It has authorized 400 more troops, and 200 more civilian contractors, to 
help wage a kind of dope-and-terror war in Colombia. We already have 400 
soldiers and 400 spies there.

"Plan Colombia" began under President Clinton, as help -- or was it 
institutionalized nosiness? -- toward that nation's struggle with drug 
cartels. As U.S. Ambassador Lew Tambs noted back in the 1980s, there was a 
"narc-FARC" connection: The guerrilla group Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias 
de Colombia finances its terrorism through control of cocaine -- at least 
some of it.

But nowadays, there's a private army on the right wing, which also runs on 
coke. As for the civilian government, if today's is any less corrupt than 
any of its predecessors, que milagro. With cocaine commanding such high 
prices, thanks to its illegality, fortunes are to be made in the countries 
of origin -- not to mention by the time it reaches the noses of the rich 
and famous in the world's glamour capitals. Police corruption in this 
country comes up from time to time. In Colombia, it's an ongoing reality.

If Washington were serious about cocaine as a truly narcoterroristic 
threat, it would declare Colombia a pariah nation and treat it as such in 
matters of trade. Better yet, the United States would call off its 
nonsensical dope wars by legalizing the stuff, spending taxpayers money 
instead on education and treatment.

But no; for decades we've had grown men and women running around the 
tropics playing cops and robbers.

Raising the ante, President Bush last year declared FARC and other 
guerrillas to be terrorist organizations, same as al-Qaida.

They're dangerous, to be sure: Guerrilleros have killed or maimed 
supreme-court justices, presidential candidates and cabinet members. As for 
narcotraficantes, they even killed their own country's goalkeeper for 
allowing the United States to score against him in a soccer game.

La violencia has plagued Colombia for more than half a century; even 
peasants live in fear of murderous bandidos, while bands of feral 
youngsters stalk shoppers on the streets of Bogota, makeshift weapons in 
hand. Communists left over from the Cold War kill in more organized fashion 
- -- and paramilitary fascists retaliate in kind.

It's a problem; Colombia's problem. Police advice, training and cooperation 
with intelligence should be part of our nation's help overcoming it. But 
U.S. troops traipsing around the jungles burning fields and breaking up 
drug labs that'll be replicated along another river within weeks? Crazy -- 
and potentially tragic.

The real "war on terror" -- whether it should be fought on military terms 
or waged with more effective police intelligence -- needs all the personnel 
our country has at its disposal, and more.

Until such time as Colombian viciosos bring their cowardly form of fighting 
to our shores or otherwise pose a clear and present danger, we should get 
our troops out of there. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake