Pubdate: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 Source: Daily Press (VA) Copyright: 2004 The Daily Press Contact: http://www.dailypress.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/585 JUSTICE IS RUNNING LATE When one of the cogs in the wheel of justice breaks down, it throws the entire system out of whack. When the cog is as critical as the state crime lab, the consequences can be far-reaching. The lab is essential in getting at the truth in criminal cases - in determining whether, for example, DNA samples link a suspect to a crime, or whether a gun was involved in a shooting. In some cases lab work is necessary to document whether a crime was committed - to confirm that the white powder in a baggie seized by police is indeed an illegal drug. The five-fold growth in the backlog of drug cases at the state forensics lab is throwing the judicial system off track. According to Paul Ferrara, head of the Division of Forensic Science, the 10 days it usually takes to complete analysis of drug evidence has stretched to an average of 82 days. That's enough to disrupt general district courts, where state guidelines call for decisions on most cases within 60 days. In Hampton, says Commonwealth's Attorney Linda Curtis, the two-or three-month wait for lab results has created "a serious problem." Prosecutors have to drop some cases in district court, then indict in circuit court when lab results are ready. Working around the lab adds to the workloads and expenses of other parts of the judicial system, including prosecutors, court staff, defendants and the police. That costs the public, and so does longer incarceration for defendants who aren't out on bond, and the additional appointment of defense attorneys when indigent defendants' cases have to be moved to circuit court. A combination of factors has driven the drug backlog to a record 11,000 cases compared with the usual 2,000. There's the increase in drug interdiction, says Ferrara, as police departments and special task forces are successful and the results of their efforts flood the lab. There's some staff turnover, which is problematic when it takes a year to get a new drug chemist fully trained. There's the effect of the state budget cuts, which kept the lab from adding staff to respond to the 18 percent growth in its drug caseload in the last four years. Ultimately, it's Gov. Mark Warner's responsibility for making sure the apparatus of the executive branch of state government works. When it doesn't, and the effect reverberates through the state's judicial system, it's up to him to make whatever adjustments are required to solve the problem. Instead of waiting until the next budget cycle, and delaying improvement for many months, the governor should root around in every corner of the administrative branch and find where a new hire could be postponed or the purchase of new equipment delayed, and the resources shifted to a higher priority. And this is a good time for Warner to start on the job of making the case - in his budget and through his visible leadership - for increased funding for the crime lab, not just to handle the drug workload but also to run harder at using DNA technology to reveal the truth within old biological evidence. The argument will be more persuasive to assembled budget makers if the Crime Commission, commonwealth's attorneys, police chiefs, judges and trial lawyers add their voices and insights. Then, when the legislature convenes, it should find the money to add the necessary capacity to the crime lab. Virginia simply has no other choice. There's too much at stake to sidestep the obligation to restore the effectiveness of this critical cog in the judicial system. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin