Pubdate: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 Source: Spartanburg Herald Journal (SC) Copyright: 2004 The Spartanburg Herald-Journal Contact: http://www.goupstate.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/977 Author: Lynne Powell Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/women.htm (Women) MOTHERS ON DRUGS - HOT TOPIC IN S.C. The case of a Gaffney woman facing felony child neglect charges after she and her newborn had cocaine in their bloodstream has ignited debate on whether addicted mothers should be prosecuted. Pamela Jane Cruz-Reyes of Gaffney was charged with unlawful child neglect on Nov. 27 after she and her newborn tested positive for cocaine. A magistrate Monday ordered her to have no contact with her child. South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster contends the law is clear: Taking cocaine is illegal and such conduct won't be tolerated. The S.C. Supreme Court has ruled that a woman's substance abuse late in pregnancy constitutes criminal child abuse. In the 1997 case of Whitner vs. South Carolina, the court ruled that a viable fetus is a "person" under the criminal child endangerment statute and that "maternal acts endangering or likely to endanger the life, comfort or health of a viable fetus" could constitute child abuse. Charging a mother with possession of a controlled substance, delivering drugs to a minor (through the umbilical cord), corruption of a minor, and child abuse and neglect is rare, but not unprecedented. McMaster's spokesman Mark Plowden said the Attorney General's Office hasn't prosecuted a similar case in several years. A 29-year-old Spartanburg mother was sentenced to five years in prison and five years probation earlier this year after she pleaded guilty to three counts of unlawful conduct toward a child by a parent. Angela Shannette Kennedy tested positive for cocaine during three pregnancies over five years. Since the mid-1980s, when media outlets began to publicize crack-cocaine addicted mothers, states have enacted various laws to deal with the problem. Fourteen states consider taking drugs during pregnancy to be a civil child abuse matter, with three states considering it grounds for civil commitment. Nine states require medical professionals to report suspected prenatal drug abuse, and four require testing for prenatal drug exposure if they suspect abuse. Nineteen states have funded drug treatment programs targeting pregnant women, and seven provide pregnant women with priority access to state-funded treatment programs. "South Carolina has nothing," said Susan K. Dunn, an attorney who defended Cornelia Whitner, who was tried for using cocaine during her third trimester. "We have nothing in place to help these mothers. In fact, if you ask for help, you better go outside South Carolina because if you tell you've taken drugs, they can take your baby after its born." Dunn is an outspoken critic of prosecuting expectant mothers who have tested positive for drugs. "It's not good health policy," Dunn said. "It scares people away from asking for help and is counterproductive." Dunn contends states should help fund programs to treat addicted mothers, not scare them into hiding. "Separating a mother from her child and throwing the book at her is not dealing with the problem," she said. "That baby needs that mother." Local hospitals use different criteria in deciding whether to drug test a child or mother. Upstate Carolina Medical Center spokesman Steve Wong said the hospital uses six criteria. If one of the criteria is met, the hospital can order the test regardless of whether the mother consents to the test, he said. The criteria that UCMC uses that could show drug abuse by the mother include: no maternal prenatal care, little or late prenatal care, placenta tearing away from the uterine wall, preterm labor or delivery with no predisposing factors or medical reasons, previously known or reported drug use, positive maternal drug screen on admission or revealed during prenatal screen. "If one or more of the criteria are met, we may order a drug screen on the baby," Wong said. In the event of a positive drug screen, the Department of Social Services would be notified. DSS then could contact law enforcement to take the child into emergency protective custody. Yvonne Despard ,Mary Black Memorial vice president of marketing, said if a child shows clinical symptoms such as tremors, convulsions or unexplained diarrhea or vomiting, a drug screen could be ordered. "We could notify DSS with or without a drug screen if we suspected substance abuse," she said. Cases of maternal substance abuse are infrequent, Despard said. Spartanburg Regional obtains informed consent from patients who undergo drug screenings. "Patients are informed that DSS will be notified of positive test results, and patients are also informed that criminal prosecution is possible if adherence to the criteria of a treatment program is not followed as required by the judicial system," reads a statement from SRMC spokeswoman Betsy McMillan. - --- MAP posted-by: Derek