Pubdate: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 Source: Kansas City Star (MO) Copyright: 2004 The Kansas City Star Contact: http://www.kcstar.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/221 Author: Benita Y. Williams, The Kansas City Star COUNTY TO USE ALL DRUG TAX SURPLUS The Jackson County Legislature has approved a $263.2 million budget for 2005 that will spend the county's entire $5.1 million anti-drug tax surplus fund. By spending the entire surplus, the county will be able to give $25 million next year to anti-drug programs.The county gave those programs more than $26 million in 2004. Most of the funding reduction is due to one-time expenses in 2004, including capital improvements at the jail and court computer upgrades. "We were . shorter (for 2005), but by working out the numbers, by moving some things back to the general fund, we were actually able to increase every line-item for anti-drug from the 2004 budget to the 2005 budget," said Legislator Dan Tarwater, chairman of the anti-drug committee. "That was not easy." But spending the surplus next year could mean less money for anti-drug programs in 2006. The surplus comes from agencies not spending all the money given to them from the anti-drug sales tax, and when the tax generates more money than expected. "We expect some amount in the surplus, but not another $5 million," county spokesman Ken Evans said. "There will be less to work with." During budget hearings this year, Tarwater said spending the surplus was in line with a 1995 county resolution to deplete the anti-drug surplus fund by 2001. Tarwater argued that the resolution reflected the intent of voters who renewed the anti-drug tax in 1995. Prosecutor Mike Sanders and County Executive Katheryn Shields debated during the hearings over how to spend anti-drug tax and other county money. The hearings culminated Thursday with an almost 7 1/2-hour session involving public testimony, a standing-room-only audience, last-minute negotiations and painstaking line-item transfers. County officials on all sides of the debate said they were pleased with the outcome. "This is my 11th budget," Shields said. "People expressed concerns that we wouldn't get a budget, but I assured everyone that we always get a budget. . Not everything I want, not everything the Legislature wants, but compromising between that, it's beneficial to the citizens of Jackson County." Legislature Chairman Scott Burnett said: "I feel good about it. . The county executive was exemplary in her work and her cooperation. . All of the department heads and the prosecutor all worked together and I think we came up with a good budget that covers all the important areas of the county." Overall, the county's 2005 budget is about $19.4 million less than this year. The decrease was caused in part by a drop in capital improvement projects. The 2004 budget included a $6.1 million renovation of the downtown courthouse that is nearing completion. However, the 2005 budget includes $1.5 million in capital projects, $5.6 million in road and bridge improvements and $900,000 for the county's general information mapping system. The sheriff also will receive an overtime increase for deputies to begin taking concealed-weapons license applications. Increases to Sanders' budget will pay for a new white-collar crimes unit support staff, additional prosecutors for domestic violence and a child-abuse prosecutor who previously was paid from a now-expired federal grant. The increase for the prosecutor will come from general fund dollars shifted from the corrections department, which Shields oversees. The cuts at the jail will be restored from the anti-drug tax surplus. Shields, Sanders and the legislators signed an agreement that the public safety needs at the jail and prosecutors office were "overwhelming" next year and that the jail needs expenses to be paid from the anti-drug tax. The pact cited a 2001 study showing 80 percent of incoming county jail inmates tested positive for illegal drugs. First glance . Jackson County's $263 million budget will use all of the county's $5.1 million anti-drug tax surplus fund. . That could mean less money for anti-drug programs in 2006. - --- MAP posted-by: Derek