Pubdate: Mon, 29 Mar 2004
Source: Red And Black, The (GA Edu University of Georgia)
Copyright: 2004 The Red and Black Publishing Co., Inc.
Contact:  http://www.redandblack.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2800
Author: Andrew Friedman
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)

LEGAL DRUGS SHOULD BE ON THE TABLE

The legalization of marijuana, or the decriminalization of any drug
for that matter, is the third rail of American liberalism.

Any politician or public figure that touches it, or any
self-respecting Democrat that wants their other views to be taken
seriously, can't go near it without their hair standing on end. They
can't touch the issue without being jolted from the public arena at
the speed of light.

Such a stance is soft on crime, is indicative of irresponsibility and
points to a lack of values or a failed appreciation of American
cultural mores.

Yet why is it such a distasteful idea that we legalize drugs? Why is
it that, "drugs are bad, mmkay?"

I ask because at the end of the day, it is not the laws erected
against drugs that I have come to question. It is this fundamental
belief that they have no place in society, and that those who seek to
use them are somehow inferior or delinquent.

Why do we cringe when we see a heroine user injecting himself? Is it
because we know he might, or soon will be, addicted? Or, is it because
we are all a little bit afraid of needles?

Why do we turn our heads in disgust from the girl doing cocaine?
Because it is sad that she needs this escape from her life, or because
we fear for her mind and body, or instead because we have been
conditioned to do so?

Why are we, as a society of college students, so much more accepting
of marijuana?

Is it because it has less addictive properties than other drugs and
stands to cause less brain damage; or because it looks not unlike a
cigarette?

I cannot help but believe that there is some fundamental psychology at
work in our fear of drugs and drug users. I want to understand it
better so I know that the decisions I make on the issue are the right
ones for the right reasons.

Let me just make the comment, before I continue, that intuitively I
understand why drugs are bad for you. I've seen the MRIs of a
patient's brain with holes in it, and I've watched the egg fry first
hand as good friends have degenerated under the influence.

I also consider addiction to be one of the saddest situations in which
a person can find themselves. To be dependent on any substance is the
ultimate erosion of a person's individuality and character.

Yet, by the same token, I have seen recreational drug users live their
lives responsibly. There is no doubt in my mind that many readers know
someone using drugs "stronger" than marijuana and aren't even aware of
it.

These people have made choices about what to do with their own body
and can remain constructive members of our society. They may be an
exception, but they are a walking contradiction to everything we have
been taught about the effects of drugs.

They are model students, businessmen and professionals.

Are they as despicable as the desperate junkies, with bloodshot eyes
and a tremble in their fingers, frantically looking for their next
fix?

Maybe not, and what does that mean for our stereotypes? Does it really
come down to a case by case basis as to whether or not a person is
able to use drugs without becoming a burden on society?

If so, what does it mean for the people who are able to snort cocaine
or take pills recreationally, in the truest sense of the word?

Granted, they are supporting a criminal element in America, but only
criminal because we have made it so.

I think perhaps it comes down to an ultimate question of what it is we
are targeting about drug use. Is it the actual drug use because it is
harmful to people and to their neighbors?

Or instead, are we trying to fight against the people who just aren't
equipped to deal with drugs in a responsible and informed manner?

If it is actually the latter (at least it should be the latter), we
need to make some fundamental changes in our nation's drug policies.

I recognize that I have offered a lot more questions than answers, but
that is because questions are all I really have.

Like many, I am just waiting for the day when we will be able to sit
down and have a rational discussion about the issue without it being a
career ending circus.

When that day will be? Yet another good question.

- -- Andrew Friedman is a junior majoring in international affairs. His
column appears Mondays.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin