Pubdate: Wed, 12 May 2004 Source: Asheville Citizen-Times (NC) Copyright: 2004 Asheville Citizen-Times Contact: http://www.citizen-times.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/863 Author: Clarke Morrison Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/youth.htm (Youth) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) SCHOOLS' RIGHT TO RANDOMLY DRUG-TEST STUDENTS BACKED BY SUPREME COURT DECISIONS ASHEVILLE - The U.S. Supreme Court twice in recent years has supported the right of public schools to randomly test some students for drug use. The court in 2002 approved random drug testing for students involved in extracurricular activities, a ruling that increased the tools available to some 14,700 school systems to fight illegal drug use. By a 5-4 vote, the court ruled in a case from Oklahoma that local school officials' responsibility for the health and safety of their students can outweigh privacy concerns. "That made it clear for the first time that schools could do random drug testing of students without suspicion," Buncombe County School Board attorney Chris Campbell said. The court already had authorized mandatory random drug testing for student-athletes in a 1995 case that noted the special safety risks and lower expectation of privacy inherent in sports, as well as the fact that athletes are role models for other students. "A student's privacy interest is limited in a public school environment where the state is responsible for maintaining discipline, health and safety," Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the majority in the more recent case. "Securing order in the school environment sometimes requires that students be subjected to greater controls than those appropriate for adults." In dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote that "the particular testing program upheld today is not reasonable, it is capricious, even perverse: (It) targets for testing a student population least likely to be at risk for illicit drugs and their damaging effects." Wholesome extracurricular activities help keep students off drugs, Ginsburg said, yet the testing policy could deter students from participating in them. The same observation was made in a friend-of-the court brief filed by the American Association of Pediatrics. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom