Pubdate: Sun, 16 May 2004
Source: Lexington Herald-Leader (KY)
Copyright: 2004 Lexington Herald-Leader
Contact:  http://www.kentucky.com/mld/heraldleader/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/240
Author: John Ed Pearce, Herald-Leader Contributing Columnist
Note: Below "And more than a quarter million of those incarcerated are 
guilty of violating nothing more than our cruel, illogical and ineffective 
drug laws."
Action: Prisoner Abuse and the Drug War - What You Can Do 
http://www.mapinc.org/alert/0291.html
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/prison.htm (Incarceration)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?199 (Mandatory Minimum Sentencing)

LOOK HIGHER, DEEPER THAN PRISON GUARDS

Americans have thrown themselves into a frenzy of guilt, remorse, shame and 
apology at the grisly accounts of abuse of Iraqi prisoners. And rightly so. 
There is guilt enough to go around, for the military, Congress and the 
defense officials who failed to exercise proper supervision.

Courts martial have been demanded and are apparently forthcoming, and there 
are bipartisan calls for the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

So far there have been few suggestions of punishment for President Bush, 
who is ultimately responsible. It was, most people seem to agree, just 
another case in which he didn't know what was going on, though he was given 
written notice last winter that bad things were afoot in Iraqi prisons.

Public shock at the barbarism is mingled with uneasiness at the realization 
that Americans are as capable of savage disregard for humane and moral 
standards as others. There may be disquieting suspicions that we, too, 
under the harsh realities of war, might have done as much.

Those familiar with the nature of war, of kill or be killed and of the 
sometimes-necessary harshness inherent in the imprisonment of the enemy, 
will perhaps feel less surprise. Military prisons have never been known for 
leniency nor mistaken for spas. Mistreatment of Americans in American 
prisons is legendary.

Neither is it surprising that some people -- remembering the four American 
contractors murdered, burned and then hanged from a bridge by cheering 
Iraqis -- would consider the treatment of Iraqi prisoners only just 
repayment, a case of doing unto others as they have done to us.

This ignores, however, the fact that our prisons are supposedly instruments 
of justice, not of revenge. And neither justice nor an attempt to win 
respect and trust of those to whom we are supposedly offering freedom and 
democracy can be achieved through punishment that degrades, humiliates and 
sometimes kills.

There is also the disturbing fact, according to veteran war correspondent 
Seymour Hersch in a current New Yorker report, that more than 3,000 of the 
Iraqis penned in the hellhole of Abu Ghraib were simply scooped up in 
dragnet raids, not guilty of violating any laws or trying to aid the enemy, 
and eligible for immediate release.

They are not likely to emerge from detention kindly disposed to our 
occupying forces or the government that we eventually install in Baghdad. 
Such resentment, along with the fury sweeping much of the Arab world, is 
not going to make our job any easier or hasten the day when we may 
disengage from this costly misadventure.

There must linger the questions of who must pay and how. Punishment should 
not, must not, be confined to the uniformed and privately employed 
underlings who committed the actual atrocities. Cries are heard on all 
sides for the resignation or firing of Rumsfeld, on the Navy theory that 
the captain is held to blame for errors occurring on his ship.

But Rumsfeld -- a tough, intelligent, capable man -- has offered persuasive 
evidence in his own defense, and if punishment comes down to a matter of 
responsibility, it is hard to see how Bush can escape unscathed. The fact 
that he received notice of wrongdoing in a vague and routine report does 
not excuse him. It was his business to learn, to know and to act.

It is also argued that Rumsfeld should resign or be fired not just for 
dereliction in this instance, but for his larger role in advising Bush in 
his disastrous decision to rush to war against Iraq, largely without 
supportable cause. But that can only raise the question of whether Rumsfeld 
persuaded the president or was persuaded by him. Bush, excuses aside, must 
shoulder the burden for this horrible mistake.

But some good may yet come of all this if -- after all the breast-beating 
and recriminations abate and the fever for punishment subsides -- Americans 
face the hypocrisy involved.

The public echoes what Bush repeatedly prates: that this incident does not 
reflect the goodness of Americans, that we are not that kind of people, 
that we would never permit it on our own. The untidy truth is that we do.

For the past decade, we have been building prisons as fast as we could 
afford and pouring into them a flood of Americans, many of whom are treated 
as brutally as any Iraqi.

Thanks to a hysterical fear of crime (the rate of which has, incidentally, 
been falling for years) and the self-righteous fervor in Congress and state 
legislatures for longer sentences for more crimes, more than 2 million 
Americans are now imprisoned, not counting those in small jails.

Our per-capita incarceration rate is now higher than that of any nominally 
civilized nation. And more than a quarter million of those incarcerated are 
guilty of violating nothing more than our cruel, illogical and ineffective 
drug laws.

The brutalities and indecencies heaped upon these marginal miscreants -- by 
overworked, ill-trained and often sadistic guards, or by fellow prisoners 
who frequently rule prison life -- defy description.

Their cost in money, lives and standards of decency are enormous. Yet the 
general public pays a fraction of the attention to these conditions that 
they give to the bloody mess in Iraq. We will benefit as a nation and a 
people if our revulsion at the horrors in Iraqi prisons spur us to notice 
the beam in our own eye.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake