Pubdate: Fri, 28 May 2004 Source: San Francisco Chronicle (CA) Copyright: 2004 Hearst Communications Inc. Contact: http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/388 Author: Bob Egelko Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/prop36.htm (Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act) SUPREME COURT LIMITS DRUG TREATMENT LAW The state Supreme Court put limits Thursday on a voter-approved law providing treatment rather than prison for drug users, ruling that the law doesn't apply to people convicted of driving under the influence of drugs. Proposition 36, passed in 2000, requires probation and treatment for anyone convicted of possessing drugs or drug paraphernalia, using drugs or similar activities, which are not spelled out in the law. It excludes crimes "not related to the use of drugs," which the court to ruled unanimously included driving under the influence. Laws against drug use are primarily intended to protect the user, while DUI laws are meant to protect the public, said Chief Justice Ronald George. He also said excusing drug-impaired drivers from jail sentences would treat them more leniently than drunken drivers and would undermine sentencing laws that require jail time for repeat DUI convictions. The court upheld the six-month jail sentence of Michelle Canty, convicted of driving under the influence of methamphetamine in Tehama County in 2001. She had sought to be referred to a treatment program instead of jail. - --- MAP posted-by: Thunder