Pubdate: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 Source: Brattleboro Reformer (VT) Copyright: 2004 Brattleboro Publishing Co. Contact: http://www.reformer.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/59 Author: Daniel Barlow, Reformer Staff Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?159 (Drug Courts) ANTI-DRUG STRATEGY OUTLINED BRATTLEBORO -- The creation of a drug court and the hiring of a coordinator to pull together area substance abuse services will be among the recommendations a town committee studying the drug problem will make to the selectboard this month. The recommendations made public Wednesday night by the Brattleboro Substance Abuse Action Team also include updating and enforcing town ordinances and reaching out to the community and landlords. These recommendations will be formally brought before the Brattleboro Selectboard at its June 15 meeting. The drug committee, whose members include two selectboard members and Police Chief John Martin, formed in late 2002 in response to a series of complaints by groups of citizens over the growing drug problem in town. In 2003, there were 82 drug-related deaths in Vermont, outpacing for the first time traffic-related deaths. In Brattleboro, residents complained of being too afraid to walk down their street even in the daytime and told stories of intimidating drug dealers who threatened violence if they went to the police. At the drug committee's Wednesday meeting, much of the discussion focused on establishing a drug court in Brattleboro. Members stated they were not recommending implementation of a drug court in Brattleboro, but suggesting that it requires a closer look. Kathryn Hayes, a family court judge in Brattleboro, said five other communities in Vermont, including Bennington and Rutland, have or are in the process of establishing drug courts. Drug courts focus more on treatment and rehabilitation, with jail sentences hanging in the background as an incentive, rather than immediate incarceration as punishment, Hayes said. "It's an attractive model," she said. "It seems more useful that warehousing people." People on probation or parole often have to check in with law enforcement officials, she said, but in a drug court setting the contact with staff and the regularity of drug testing is increased and often more effective. She mentioned that last month, Commissioner of Public Safety Kerry Sleeper recommended the use of education, treatment, drug courts and methadone clinics to combat the drug problem. There are numerous formats for drug courts, she added, and some set up a court separate from the local courts, while others work within the system and require little or no additional costs. Such courts may require an initial investment -- although there is federal money available in the form of grants -- but the cost savings in the future are realized because the courts don't see the same offenders come through again and again, Hayes explained. Drug courts typically have a failure rate of approximately 18 percent, she said, compared to the traditional court system of between 40 and 60 percent. Over a 30-month period, the drug court can result in a $5,000 savings per drug court participant, according to a recent study. "When someone gets to a criminal court, we usually see them at the end of their tether and our function is to be the bottom they are hitting," said Hayes. "With a drug court, we become a trampoline." The town of Brattleboro would have no authority to organize a drug court, said Hayes, although a show of support from the selectboard to the state would go a long way to its establishment. First, she said, the state's attorney and public defender need to be brought in on the plan. The recommendations also suggest the appointment or hiring of a coordinator to work with the 22 agencies addressing drug-related problems. Many groups are working on prevention, intervention, treatment and enforcement, but there is no coordination of these activities at the town level, said drug committee Chairman Michael Szostak. "Without someone working with all these groups and communicating to the town, we don't have the slightest chance of addressing the drug problem," he said. Other recommendations include holding town-sponsored forums in various neighborhoods to gather information and hear residents' concerns; establishing an anonymous tip line to report drug-related activity; and review, update and enforce town ordinances such as nuisance abatement and curfews. The landlords in town especially need support in the fight to get suspected drug-dealing tenants out of their buildings, said committee member Joseph Pieciak. "Just look at the loss of rent ... sometimes it takes between $1,500 and 2,000 just to get them out and somebody else in," Pieciak said. "And then they become someone else's problem." - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D