Pubdate: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 Source: Post, The (Zambia) Copyright: Post Newspapers 2004 Contact: http://www.zamnet.zm/zamnet/post/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3160 Author: Noel Sichalwe LUSAKA MAN JAILED 15 YEARS FOR TRAFFICKING IN COCAINE LUSAKA High Court judge Gregory Phiri on Friday sentenced a 56-year-old Lusaka resident to 15 years from the earlier seven years for trafficking in cocaine following a failed appeal. This was in a case in which Ibrahim Bhana appealed to the High Court against the seven years sentence he was given by the magistrate's court for drug trafficking. Bhana is alleged to have placed 0.378 grammes of cocaine in bread and sent one of his female colleagues to take it to two prisoners who were also convicted of drug trafficking offences at Lusaka Central Prison. Delivering the judgment, judge Phiri said the seven year jail sentence meted out by the trial magistrate was too lenient considering the circumstances surrounding the offence and substituted the earlier sentence with the maximum 15 years. Judge Phiri said prisons were confined places where society expected offenders to reform and became law-abiding citizens for the betterment of the community. "We all expect to have a better country when prisoners reform," he said. "Taking a hardcore prohibited drug like cocaine, in whatever quantity, to inmates in prison for their use is the most aggravating fact in the entire regime of the drug offences. In this particular case, the cocaine was taken to two particular inmates who are on record of having been incarcerated on drug related offences. The facts are extreme in themselves such that a sentence of seven years is manifestly inadequate that it induces a sense of shock." "The circumstances are so extreme and uncommon calling for an equally extreme and uncommon punishment. For this reason, I quash the sentence of seven years and in its place I will inflict the severest offence of 15 years imprisonment with hard labour. Since the appellant has been on bail pending appeal, the sentence shall run with effect from the date of being re-admitted into custody. For this purpose, bail pending appeal is revoked and a warrant of arrest shall be issued forthwith." Bhana's lawyer Robert Simeza argued that the trial magistrate erred in law by convicting their client on uncollaborated evidence and basing it on circumstantial evidence. He urged the court to acquit Bhana. However, judge Phiri dismissed all the grounds of appeal. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D