Pubdate: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 Source: Isthmus (WI) Copyright: 2005 Isthmus Contact: http://www.thedailypage.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/215 Author: Bill Lueders DAVE CAVES ON POT PROMISE Drug reform takes political courage. Anyone got some? Believe it or not, I'm one of those people who could pass a drug test hands down -- or pants down, as the case might be. Give me a cup and I'll fill it with 100% drug-free personal product. No trace of marijuana, cocaine, heroin, ecstasy, acid, goofballs, angel dust, crystals, leapers, mescaline, snappers, white lightning, yellow jackets or even alcohol. I'm clean, man. Have been for years. So the lack of sensible drug policies does not affect me. Society can burn druggies at the stake and the worst I'll suffer is getting too warm as I walk by. We can pack our prisons with drug offenders and all it means is that folks like me must pay higher taxe -- hey! -- I guess I am affected, after all. Self-interest aside, there are ample reasons to oppose the massively stupid and cruel war on drugs. That members of a culture that prescribes a pill for every ill should turn to substances for pleasure or pain relief is at most a public health problem, not inherently criminal behavior. Madisonians grasp this better than most. In 1977, voters here overwhelmingly approved Madison ordinance 23.20, which decriminalizes public possession and allows private possession of specified amounts of marijuana and hashish; it was also the first law anywhere to legalize medical marijuana with a doctor's note. Last year, the Common Council backed a local medical marijuana awareness week. And the public has consistently favored politicians who promise to pursue less punitive drug policies. In fact, our current mayor, Dave Cieslewicz, backed the legalization of marijuana during the 2003 campaign, trumping rival Paul Soglin's weak-tea support for legalizing just medical marijuana. Candidate Cieslewicz also vowed to rethink the city's harsh penalties for employees who test positive for drugs. But, as mayor, Cieslewicz has disappointed voters gullible enough to believe him. Like other municipalities, the city of Madison is required by federal law to subject employees who drive vehicles to pre-employment, random, for-cause and post-accident drug and alcohol testing. But it is the city's own decision to fire workers who test positive more than once per year or thrice per career. (Madison Metro employees get just two strikes and they're out.) Since 1995, 39 city employees have lost their jobs due to drug testing. Two-thirds of the positive results are for marijuana. That's in part because pot can remain in a person's system for months, while harder drugs like heroin and cocaine flush out in a few days. Workers subject to testing who want to get high would be well-advised to use these harder drugs. How messed up is that? This fall, when a city streets worker who tested positive for pot for the second time in ten years sought to hold Cieslewicz to his campaign pledge, the mayor used the opportunity to again pander to his progressive base. He told Isthmus he was no fan of drug testing and was inclined "to back off of the penalties." To this end, he asked interim Human Resources director Roger Goodwin and City Attorney Michael Mays to "look into the penalties and give me some recommendations about what we can do." What a guy. To close observers of city hall, however, the mayor's call for a staff review was suspicious from the start. "Generally, that's what you do when you want something to go away," reflects Ald. Austin King. Indeed, there was never any doubt what the report would recommend, since Goodwin is a big fan of the current policy. Released in the dead zone between Christmas and New Year's, the report (see thedailypage.com under Document Feed) claims that relaxing penalties would increase the city's liability, if an employee impaired by drugs or alcohol were to cause an accident. Yet the report notes only one lawsuit involving a city employee who tested positive following an accident -- and, in that case, the jury never learned that the driver evidently used marijuana "several days" prior. Goodwin concedes that all but a handful of city workers, including this one, have tested clean in post-accident tests. So why not ease up on the penalties, as Cieslewicz has said he would like? The report notes that Metro drivers had far fewer positives than other drivers, and speculates this is because Metro drivers face sterner penalties. Therefore, it opines, "any attempt to reduce sanctions for non-Metro drivers...will result in an increase in the [percentage] of tests coming up positive." Hence, the report recommends staying the course. This thin reed gave Cieslewicz the cover he sought. "The mayor," asserts chief of staff Janet Piraino, "believes our current policies are reasonable and is not inclined to propose any changes at this time." Cieslewicz is certainly not the first politician to give lip service to saner drug policies while doing little to bring them about. There's good reason for his reticence. Whatever else you might say about it, the war on drugs is emphatically not a failure. Rather, it has succeeded spectacularly at its clear if unstated goal: Generating oodles of cash for law enforcement and many thousands of bodies (especially nonwhite male ones) for the booming prison industry. Thus the war has powerful advocates eager to oppose any who would stand in its way. Witness the drubbing dished out recently by Scott Favour, president of the Madison police union, when Progressive Dane dared question a case in which the cops searched a man's home after nabbing him in a traffic stop with an amount of marijuana less than the threshold for criminal charges. Favour, in a published letter, went ballistic, accusing the group of being anti-police and pro-crime. No doubt the police union would do the same to Mayor Cieslewicz if he ever put any political might behind his belief that marijuana should be legalized. Of course, maybe that was just something he said to get elected. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake