Pubdate: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 Source: Winnipeg Free Press (CN MB) Copyright: 2005 Winnipeg Free Press Contact: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/502 Author: Cristin Schmitz, CanWest News Service Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/af.htm (Asset Forfeiture) PROCEEDS OF CRIME BILL TO BE DELAYED New Democrats Want To Hear Witnesses OTTAWA -- The NDP has stymied the plans of other federal parties to fast-track into law a controversial bill that would make it easier to forfeit to the Crown the assets of convicted gang members and drug traffickers. NDP justice critic Joe Comartin confirmed he informed the government Thursday his party won't join with the Liberals, Conservatives and Bloc Quebecois to give the necessary unanimous consent to push the proposed proceeds of crime bill through all stages next week. He said the NDP has doubts about the constitutionality of the proposed proceeds of crime bill tabled by the government last month, and wants the Commons justice committee to take the time to hear witnesses on the bill. If passed, the law would force those convicted of organized crimes or several serious drug offences to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that their assets are not the proceeds of crime, or see their property forfeit to the Crown. The proposed procedure would shift the normal burden of proof from the prosecution to the defence, a move usually frowned on by the Supreme Court of Canada. Comartin said the earliest the bill is likely to be studied by the justice committee is next fall. That means the only justice bills expected to pass into law before MPs flee Ottawa for their summer recess are the same-sex marriage bill now before the Commons, and the child pornography bill currently in the Senate. Left to languish until the fall are bills to decriminalize marijuana, boost judges' salaries, toughen the antiquated animal cruelty laws, and to authorize drug impairment testing of motorists. Comartin said academics, defence lawyers and the Canadian Bar Association have expressed concerns to him that the proceeds of crime bill covers too many crimes and could have unforeseen consequences. He wants to assure himself the bill would survive Charter attack. "The last thing we need is more litigation to the Supreme Court on criminal law matters," said Comartin, a Windsor, Ont. lawyer. "The bill is complicated in terms of the impact it's going to have, and the responsibility it is going to impose, on (the offender's) family or business associates" - --- MAP posted-by: Beth