Pubdate: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 Source: Charlotte Observer (NC) Copyright: 2005 The Charlotte Observer Contact: http://www.charlotte.com/mld/observer/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/78 Author: Tim Whitmire, Associated Press Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?159 (Drug Courts) PRISON ALTERNATIVE IN PERIL Drug Treatment Program Lauded But State Money Uncertain (AP) It was a graduation ceremony like many others. Ellie Andrews got a diploma. Her 3 1/2-year-old daughter Abbey applauded, and later licked the icing off a celebration cupcake. But the commencement speaker was a judge who congratulated Andrews for completing a nearly yearlong treatment program in Mecklenburg County's drug court, where coursework included staying clean for 340 days and never missing a court or counseling session. "It was hard and time-consuming, but it was worth it," said Andrews, 30. "It's much better than the alternative." For Andrews, the alternative was a prison term of at least two years. Instead, she ended up in the drug court, an option offered to some nonviolent offenders that studies have found to be much more effective than traditional drug treatment programs. But despite the program's successes, and the support of both local and statewide court officials, the drug courts in Mecklenburg County and more than a dozen other judicial districts around the state are in peril as legislators in Raleigh negotiate a budget for the next two years. The Senate's version of the budget cuts nearly all of their budget of just over $1 million. Sen. Scott Thomas, D-Craven, one of the budget writers, believes the courts can be run using existing resources and untapped federal drug treatment funds. But without state money, Mecklenburg County officials say they'll have to shut down their drug courts by Oct. 1. And even if the money is restored, there remains a deep conflict between the locally run courts and the state Administrative Office of the Courts, which is trying to standardize drug court operations across the state. "I don't understand it," said Phil Howerton, the Mecklenburg District Court judge who congratulated Andrews at her graduation last week. "Come on, guys, this works. Why kill it?" On that point -- that drug courts work -- there appears to be little debate. Mecklenburg County's drug court, the state's first when it opened in 1996, today handles more offenders than any other in North Carolina and has been a national model. A state study released in March reported 2004 graduation rates of 35 percent and a retention rate of more than 65 percent for all of North Carolina's drug courts. While that might appear low, national studies have found that 80 percent to 90 percent of drug abusers don't even make it to the one-year mark of traditional treatment programs. One recent national study, which included drug court graduates from North Carolina, found that only 16.4 percent of 17,000 drug court graduates had been re-arrested and charged with a felony. Estimates of money saved by drug courts, which can substitute for incarceration and are aimed at preventing future arrests, trials and prison time, vary widely, but supporters agree the long-term payoff is substantial. "It works," said Rep. Becky Carney, D-Mecklenburg, who successfully insisted the House budget include the money for the drug courts left out of the Senate version. "Why would we try to stop something that has got a proven track record?" The question of state funding is now before a committee working on a compromise budget . Thomas, the senator who handles courts budgeting, said the Senate's cuts don't mean the end of drug courts. "It was our intent for the drug treatment courts to continue to exist with existing personnel," he said. Howerton and others in Mecklenburg County, where courts already are overburdened, dismiss that logic. "It's incredible to me that the legislature would pass up the opportunity .. to treat defendants and avoid the recidivism that we've had for so many years ... for the relatively minor amount of money the drug courts need to operate," Howerton said. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom