Pubdate: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 Source: Peoria Journal Star (IL) Copyright: 2005sPeoria Journal Star Contact: http://pjstar.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/338 Author: Pam Adams, Columnist Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine) LEARNING LESSONS FROM THE DRUG WAR The words caught my eye immediately. "We're not going to arrest our way out of this problem." That they came from the mouth of soldier in the war on drugs, a former undercover cop, made them all the more eye-catching. Tom McNamara, special projects coordinator for the Southern Illinois Enforcement Group, was talking about the latest front in the war on drugs - methamphetamine. He's not the first law enforcement officer to conclude police and punishment can't win this battle alone, but it's still rare to hear anyone say it that political leaders might actually take seriously. Twenty years after crack, you'd think they would have learned a lesson. Cheap and highly addictive, a phrase regularly used to explain methamphetamine's lure, was commonly used in reference to crack in the 1980s. Both drugs create similar highs and similar problems - except for the meth labs. Meth production cranks up the dangers inherent in the drug economy. Not only does it eliminate that well-known middle man, the drug smuggler, its manufacture relies on back-country entrepreneurs willing to blow up themselves and endanger everyone around them in ways more like suicide bombers than the average crack-house franchise. By coincidence, Randall Webber and I had talked about the pernicious chemical dangers of illicit meth labs a few days before I read McNamara's quote in Mike Lawrence's column, which appeared on this page yesterday. During the course of a meandering conversation, Webber, who knows as much about treating drug addictions as McNamara knows about enforcing drug laws, mentioned an even more startling point. "Gangs in Chicago don't sell meth; they don't want to sell it," Webber said. "It would compete with crack." That's because a meth high lasts four to ten times longer than a crack high, he said. Even if crack and meth were the same price, which they're not, meth would be the better buy, so to speak. "That would cut down on profits." Webber, a senior trainer at Chestnut Health Systems in Bloomington, detailed how some experts debate whether meth is more likely to produce paranoid psychosis than crack is, but my mind was stuck in replay. Did he just tell me Chicago drug lords would rather sell crack than meth because of the profit motive? Crack is considered the drug of America's predominantly black inner cities. Meth is seen as the homemade equivalent of America's predominantly white rural areas. In a world where researchers routinely find that black Americans, collectively, pay a higher price for houses, cars, groceries, loans, insurance and most other consumer goods than their whiter counterparts, am I to conclude white drug addicts get a better bargain on drugs, too? The destruction sweeping through the country's rural ghettos is well-known in poor black neighborhoods. It is another of those signs the old folks used to warn about - what happens in black America first always hits white America sooner or later, if not at the exact same time. Of course, it's much easier, or it should be, to look at methamphetamine's course and realize we can't arrest our way out of this problem. The prisons are already overcrowded and state budgets strained, with young black males serving long sentences for non-violent drug offenses. The foster-care system is already overwhelmed with black children removed from their homes as a result of parental drug use and abuse. The health-care system is already taxed, in part, by the rise of drug-related AIDS cases, yet another category where black people are disproportionately represented. Crack cocaine has already taught a costly lesson about what not to do. How we deal with meth and crack too, politically and otherwise from here on, will show if we actually learned anything. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth