Pubdate: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 Source: Watauga Democrat (NC) Copyright: 2005 Watauga Democrat Newspapers, Inc. Contact: http://www.wataugademocrat.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2322 Author: Jerry Sena Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine) SHERIFF MARK SHOOK EDUCATES CONGRESS ABOUT METH ADDICTION Watauga County Sheriff Mark Shook talked with Congress Tuesday about something he's come to know very well -- methamphetamine. Sheriff Mark Shook (far right, seated) addresses a congressional subcommittee about meth dangers as committee member Rep. Virginia Foxx (back to camera) looks on. Photo submitted Rep. Virginia Foxx (5th District-R) invited Shook to Capitol Hill to lend his expertise to a subcommittee hearing on the growing threat of methamphetamine addiction. His pioneering efforts to fight the spread of meth in northwestern North Carolina have made Shook a popular speaker at drug abuse conferences, law-enforcement seminars, and legislative hearings here in his home state. The first-term sheriff has already lobbied for tougher meth laws before a N.C. House judiciary committee earlier this month. This is the first time he's been asked to speak before Congress. Shook was one of about a dozen healthcare providers, social workers and law enforcement professionals from around the country to testify at Tuesday's hearing. Joining Shook was another first-timer, Rutherford County Chief Deputy Phil Byers, who was on Capitol Hill at the invitation of another U.S. Representative out of North Carolina, Patrick McHenry. McHenry (R-Cherryville) is the vice chairman of the House Government Reform Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources, which hosted the hearing. Shook read from a prepared statement as he addressed committee members, including Foxx, who is a freshman legislator. "It was truly an honor to join Virginia Foxx in Washington, D.C. to fight meth abuse," said Shook in a statement released by Foxx's office shortly after the hearing. "Like me, Congresswoman Foxx is committed to eliminating meth in Watauga County and nationwide. Her tenacity during the hearing left me feeling hopeful about our prospects, and thankful for her representation." Foxx was equally complimentary of Shook's performance at the hearing, which was broadcast live on C-SPAN. "I am indeed proud and honored to have Sheriff Shook here today to share his successes with Congress and I know his story will be of benefit to the Subcommittee and to other communities that are afflicted with meth abuse. The challenge this drug poses is strong, serious and immediate, and so too must be our response. The outstanding job Sheriff Shook has done at the local level must be duplicated at the federal level if we are to eradicate methamphetamine from our communities." In his testimony, Shook recalled his first inkling several years past that a new drug problem might be emerging in Watauga County. "Methamphetamine was a problem we'd heard about, and one we believed was a faraway problem - -- a California problem," Shook said. "In Spring of 2002, our (county) was seriously invaded by the scourge of methamphetamines. And we were not prepared. "I was elected sheriff in 2002," Shook continued, "and before my election I was a detective in the Sheriff's Office. The year before I took office I noticed a trend developing in cases I was investigating. I kept hearing the word 'meth'. "I was vaguely aware of methamphetamine from training and word-of-mouth, but I really didn't know much about it. What I did know was that meth was being identified with more and more criminal activity," he said. Since his election, Shook has made meth lab eradication a top priority. State Department of Justice figures have shown a marked decrease in the spread of meth labs within Watauga County. The county had seen a doubling of meth lab discoveries each year since the first few were uncovered in 2001. Last year Watauga held steady at 34 -- which was good enough to top the state just the year before -- while counties to the south such as Rutherford and McDowell saw their numbers rocket to 43 each. Rutherford's Chief Deputy Byers said, as of June 30 law enforcement agencies in his county had already located 25 labs or waste disposal sites related to labs. Shook said such discoveries had become scarce in his jurisdiction. "It is now difficult to find a clear-cut meth lab in our county," he said. "There are still a few in operation and we're closing in on those. We do not find dumpsites where lab-related materials are illegally dumped. But these have declined also." Shook attributed the county's successes to the formation of the Northwestern North Carolina Methamphetamine Task Force, a three-county coalition (Ashe, Wilkes and Watauga) of state, federal and local law enforcement agencies, social services and medical providers. "We have worked hard to deter people from manufacturing meth." Shook said. "And it's making it more difficult to get the necessary materials (for making meth). We have worked to educate our citizens and we've developed relationships with our retailers." Along with pharmaceuticals manufacturers, retailers have been the most stringent opponents of a proposed law currently under scrutiny in the N.C. General Assembly. The law, which has already gained approval in the Senate but has been stalled in a House judiciary committee, would place restrictions on the sale of over-the-counter medicines containing the essential ingredients of meth -- ephedrine and pseudoephedrine. In his testimony Tuesday, Shook echoed the message he delivered to North Carolina legislators earlier this month. "We need laws passed controlling the sale of pseudoephedrine, the necessary ingredient for meth production," he said. "States such as Oklahoma have passed legislation making it very difficult for meth producers to produce or steal large amounts of pseudoephedrine," Shook continued. "Laws controlling the over-the-counter sales of pseudoephedrine have had a significant impact and have contributed to a substantial drop in meth production in states passing them. "North Carolina is considering similar laws, but has not adopted any as of yet," Shook said. "The passage of federal legislation controlling the sale of pseudoephedrine would have the single biggest impact on illicit meth producers." - --- MAP posted-by: Beth