Pubdate: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 Source: Claremore Daily Progress, The (OK) Copyright: 2005, The Claremore Daily Progress Contact: http://www.claremoreprogress.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2044 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine) OUR BETTER METH LAW U. S. Senator Tom Coburn was backing views of Oklahoma crime fighters including Claremore Police Chief Mickey Perry in challenging a proposed federal law that would replace Oklahoma's powerful and effective legal tool against illegal methamphetamines. Former narcotics undercover agent Perry praised the state law as "highly effective" in erasing "meth labs," that used over-the-counter drugs to manufacture highly-addictive, dangerous and illegal drugs. Meth and crack cocaine are commonly considered the most lethal of all addictive chemical substances in the underworld. One usage, it generally believed, results in life-long, hard-to-cure addiction. Lives by the millions have been wrecked by these made-from-chemical killers. Moments of ecstasy quickly resolve into stark madness from which users are never cured but, with tough restraint, are "recovering addicts." While Perry and Scott Rowland, the knowledgeable lawyer for the state Bureau of Narcotics, both praise Congress for attempting to nationally apply the innovative, landmark Oklahoma law they fear "unintended consequences" by part of the law that pre-empts the effective state statute. Perry and Rowland agree that "a national uniform standard" of controlling medicines necessary to manufacture meth is needed but the federal law. Rowland says federal laws should not pre-empt "the ability of Oklahoma lawmakers and the governor to continue protecting Oklahoma citizens." Rowland notes that after the federal Meth Control Act of 1996 was passed, lab seizure in Oklahoma doubled from "125 in 1996 to 241 in 1997." It was amended in 2000 then seizures "jumped from 946 to 1,191. Perry credits the self-effacing lawyer Rowland with virtually writing HB 2176, the bill that Oklahoma lawmakers enacted and that the now pending federal legislation duplicates. Unfortunately, it adds the unsavory part that would stop state's from enacting their own laws. Without HB 2176, Rowland says "all available evidence thus suggests we would now be experiencing yet another record year for meth lab seizures rather than an 80-90 percent reduction." Coburn and two other senators last week derailed Senate action on the "combat Meth Act of 2005 championed by California Sen. Dianne Feinstein. While she feared the powerful pharmaceutical lobby sparked opposition, Perry said Coburn was guided by Oklahoma and Missouri state-level agents who operate under similar laws. While the Act include large appropriations for hiring more prosecutors and federal agents and generally could trigger a uniform nationwide fight to shuttered meth labs. Rowland wrote boldly that "once enacted, the federal legislation could be altered at the will of Congress, and it has been my experience that the influence of pharmaceutical giants is much more pronounced at the federal level than we experienced at the state level." In its final days before the traditional August recess, the senate subcommittee should rethink and rewrite that damaging part of the Combat Met Act that silences the very effective statutes written by alert state legislatures and effectively enforced by local officers. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom