Pubdate: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 Source: Vancouver Sun (CN BC) Copyright: 2005 The Vancouver Sun Contact: http://www.canada.com/vancouver/vancouversun/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/477 Author: Jonathan Fowlie Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?241 (Methamphetamine - Canada) METH PLAN GETS FAINT PRAISE B.C.'s solicitor-general says the highest penalty is of limited help as many meth traffickers don't go to jail. A federal crackdown on methamphetamine announced Thursday drew limited praise in B.C., with the solicitor-general asking why it didn't include mandatory minimum sentences and others saying it addresses only part of the problem. "I'm happy [about the announcement] only if we are going to address treatment and prevention as well," said Cpl. Scott Rintoul of the B.C. RCMP's drug awareness section. "If we're not, then we're absolutely no further ahead." B.C. Solicitor-General John Les said he is encouraged by the announcement, but questioned how effective it will be to raise maximum penalties, but set no mandatory minimum penalties. Their comments came after federal Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh and Justice Minister Irwin Cotler announced the federal government will increase maximum penalties for possession, trafficking, production and importation of methamphetamine, also known as meth or crystal meth. The maximum sentence for methamphetamine production and distribution will be life in prison, up from the previous maximum of 10 years, bringing it into line with the penalties for similar offences involving cocaine and heroin. There will also be stiffer penalties for illegal possession of precursor chemicals, such as those used to make methamphetamine. Those convicted of such an offence face fines of up to $5,000, up to three years in prison, or both. "We are making a clear, unambiguous statement today about the gravity of the offence and about the responsibility of the offender," Cotler said. At a news conference Thursday afternoon, Les was supportive of the changes, but questioned why no minimum sentences were laid out. Les pointed to sentences for those convicted of trafficking in cocaine and heroin, which already carry a maximum penalty of life in prison. "We've seen too often in the past where [conditional] sentences have been given for these offences," he said. "I think conditional sentences in these cases are entirely inappropriate and I would hope that the courts are listening today that society thinks that crystal meth is a very very serious issue." But Cotler said research has shown minimum sentences do not work, and that it is more effective to send a message to the courts through a higher maximum penalty. A man who works with drug addicts and other marginalized people in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside said sentencing alone cannot fix the methamphetamine problem. "Ten to life didn't work for cocaine, 10 to life hasn't worked for heroin, so I'm assuming it's not going to work for meth," said Mark Townsend, a manager with the Portland Hotel Society, which provides housing, advocacy and clean needles for marginalized people in the Downtown Eastside, many of them addicted to drugs. Townsend said most addicts need support programs and long-term treatment, and was skeptical that tougher sentencing would have any effect. Dosanjh agreed more needs to be done for drug treatment, and he and Cotler said Thursday's announcement is simply part of a larger strategy. HARD TIME: Harsher penalties for possessing, producing and trafficking meth and other drugs have been introduced: - - Maximum penalty for production and trafficking of cocaine, heroin, opium and, now, methamphetamine: Life in prison. Previous maximum penalty for production and trafficking of methamphetamine: 10 years in prison. - - Maximum penalty for possession of cocaine, heroin, opium and, now, methamphetamine: Seven years in prison. Previous maximum penalty for possession of methamphetamine: Three years in prison. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin