Pubdate: Thu, 01 Sep 2005
Source: Milwaukee Magazine
Contact:  http://www.milwaukeemagazine.com
Feedback: 
http://www.milwaukeemagazine.com/contactus/feedback.html
Address: 417 East Chicago Street, Milwaukee, WI 53202
Fax: 414-273-0016
Copyright: 2005 Milwaukee Magazine
Author: Bruce Murphy
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)

Murphy's Law

This Week's News And Views By Bruce Murphy

A COCAINE USER FOR COUNTY EXECUTIVE?

And: Why Dan Finley Deserves His Pay

Everything seems to be going right for Rep. Dan Vrakas (R-Delafield) in the 
race for Waukesha county executive. He seems like the perfect candidate: 
Vrakas is a lifelong resident of Waukesha, has a small business background 
(worked in this father's restaurant) and 14 years of solid service in the 
assembly, and boasts impeccable Republican credentials as a pro-tax freeze 
conservative who heads the assembly GOP caucus.

Alas, Vrakas has one slight problem: a criminal offense that is a matter of 
public record. In 1984, he was arrested in Lake Geneva on a cocaine 
possession charge.

Capitol insiders with long memories know all about this. In fact, the 
Journal Sentinel wrote about it in 1996. In that story, Vrakas said he paid 
a fine and has not used illegal drugs since then. He did not reveal how 
much cocaine he had or the amount of the fine.

"It's just one of those episodes in a person's life you'd like to forget 
about," Vrakas said at the time. "I certainly learned a lesson as a result 
of it."

Until now, Vrakas has been seen as the clear front runner in the race for 
executive. He was the first to announce his candidacy and is expected to 
have the best organization in place. He has $16,000 in campaign 
contributions in his legislative war chest he can use to run for executive. 
And he has high name recognition because his father served 16 years as 
mayor of Waukesha and owned a popular area restaurant. Dan Vrakas gained 
added momentum after Jenifer Finley, wife of outgoing Waukesha County 
Executive Dan Finley, threw in with the obvious front-runner by announcing 
she wouldn't run for the post and would instead serve as Vrakas' campaign 
manager.

The drug charge was likely to come out eventually. Will that stop his 
momentum? If this was an African-American candidate, say, a Marvin Pratt 
running for mayor, I suspect it might have caused difficulties. In Vrakas' 
case, the offense may be dismissed as a youthful indiscretion. Vrakas, now 
49, would have been about 28 at the time of his arrest.

Vrakas has said his drug arrest came at a "low point" of his life, shortly 
after the death of his brother. This plea for understanding seems 
reasonable, but Vrakas hasn't offered equal sympathy to cancer patients and 
others who want marijuana to be legalized for medical uses. Polls show 70% 
- - 80% of state residents would favor such a bill, but Vrakas has opposed 
the proposal.

All of which doesn't matter in the race for county executive, except as it 
relates to Vrakas' character. If Vrakas is forthright with voters about his 
record, this 21-year-old offense may not matter. But one thing is certain: 
The campaign for county executive is far from over.

Why Dan Finley Deserves His Pay

I have been a frequent critic of executive pay, both at private companies 
and nonprofits, but the $185,000 that Dan Finley will earn to run the 
Milwaukee Public Museum is anything but a high salary. It is a bargain for 
the museum. Those posing for holy pictures (Milwaukee County Executive 
Scott Walker and some county board members) by demanding the museum board 
go back on its agreement with Finley are only hurting the museum and its 
national reputation.

Finley's hiring was a huge coup and the first good news in months for an 
institution that has faced unending problems. With 14 years experience as a 
well-regarded Waukesha county executive running a $250 million 
organization, Finley has tremendous experience as an administrator.

Before getting into politics, Finley held fund-raising jobs with Carroll 
College, the Leukemia Society of America and the Muscular Dystrophy 
Association. He is a personable, well-liked politician with countless 
contacts who could build the constituency of donors to the museum. In 
particular, his base in Waukesha could add supporters for a statewide 
attraction like the museum, which needs regional support from 
philanthropists. Finley has already announced support for a seven-county 
cultural district, which would put a Waukesha face and perspective on an 
issue that has often been seen as a tax handout to Milwaukee.

A Journal Sentinel survey of 10 natural history museums found that Finley's 
salary was slightly higher than the median pay for executives. But this was 
according to "the most recently reported figures." Anyone familiar with 
nonprofits knows the information comes from annual tax filings by museums 
which are usually at least two years old. Once adjusted for this, Finley is 
likely to be at or even below the median salary.

Meanwhile, consider the challenge he faces. Most natural history museums 
have an endowment of $10 million, $30 million, $50 million or more that 
automatically spins off annual interest that helps pay for its budget. The 
Milwaukee Public Museum had just a $4 million endowment and spent nearly 
every dollar of it. It is also running a huge annual deficit. Finley has 
taken on what is easily the biggest fundraising challenge in Milwaukee, and 
may be one of the most challenging non-profit jobs in America.

And he's doing it for less salary than that earned by the head of the 
Milwaukee Art Museum ($250,000), United Way ($150,000 plus $85,000 in 
deferred compensation), Greater Milwaukee Committee ($225,000), and 
countless other nonprofit heads in Milwaukee.

The comparison to Finley's salary as county executive, or to Walker's 
salary, is irrelevant. Political jobs always pay less. Walker knows this, 
but apparently couldn't resist undercutting a fellow Republican like Finley 
for political gain.

Finley left his job as county executive with the understanding he would be 
paid a certain salary, only to have politicians suggest he be 
double-crossed. What is the message to candidates nationally, when the 
public museum or any other Milwaukee non-profit that gets some county tax 
dollars (like the art museum or Marcus Center for the Performing Arts) 
tries to find a new leader? This could scare away future candidates and 
certainly won't help the museum's credibility.

McCarthyism Gets a Pass from the Journal Sentinel

What in the world is going on at the Journal Sentinel?

Last week the Republican Party held a news conference where it claimed that 
nine people voted twice, voting in Milwaukee and one other city. The party, 
however, would not release the names of these people, leaving no way to 
prove or disprove the claim. Yet somehow this non-news story made the front 
page of the Journal Sentinel metro section.

But it gets worse. The story by reporter Greg Borowski waited until the 
27th paragraph to quote Sue Edman, executive director of the city Election 
Commission, who said a duplicate vote cannot be proven without the name and 
address of the alleged perpetrator. Without this documentation, in short, 
the Journal Sentinel simply had an unproven partisan claim that it 
headlined and treated like real news.

But it gets still worse. The press conference was held outside the home of 
Stuart Schenk and Gayle Schenk, where Republican state chairman Rick Graber 
and other GOP leaders accused someone there of voting twice. No name was 
apparently suggested by Graber, but the obvious suspect was the Schenks' 
son Joseph, who is now in Chicago studying to join the Franciscan Order of 
the Catholic Church. Joseph is likely on the voting rolls in both cities, 
but his parents said Joseph did not vote in Milwaukee or request an 
absentee ballot.

As countless stories in the Journal Sentinel have made clear, clerical 
mistakes are occasionally made by the city Election Commission, so it is 
quite possible that Joseph Schenk was recorded as voting when he did not. 
But Schenk, a man studying to join a religious order, has now had his 
reputation besmirched as a possible criminal who voted twice illegally.

The whole thing smacks of McCarthyism, of making reckless and unproven 
accusations against an innocent party. I suspect Graber may already regret 
having handled the news conference this way. Partisanship often leads to 
overreaching. But the media is supposed to be our bulwark against such 
manipulation. How could the Journal Sentinel treat this trumped-up 
non-event as a news story?  
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth