Pubdate: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 Source: Abbotsford News (CN BC) Copyright: 2005 Hacker Press Ltd. Contact: http://www.abbynews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1155 Author: Michael Clarke Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v05.n1254.a10.html Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?196 (Emery, Marc) POT ACTIVIST'S ARREST IS A POLITICAL, NOT LEGAL, ISSUE Editor, The News; The Abbotsford News recently published commentaries by Kurt Langman and John Pifer addressing the controversy surrounding the arrest of Marc Emery for extradition to the United States to stand trial for selling pot seeds. Mr. Langman was just plain wrong when he wrote "any handwringing over our 'loss of (Canadian) sovereignty' (in this affair) is unrealistic," and Mr. Pifer was also wrong when he wrote: "The apologists-spew a stream of disinformation suggesting that his arrest-is some form of violation of Canadian sovereignty." Regardless of one's position on marijuana, we should all agree that the federal cannabis decriminalization bills have become a political hot potato, and are subject to U.S. pressure to back off. We should also agree that Mr. Emery has become a major grassroots political force seeking the outright legalization of cannabis, and that the penalties Marc could face in the U.S. - mandatory 10 years to life imprisonment - are extremely severe when compared to Canadian penalties. Obviously Mr. Langman and Mr. Pifer do not know the Extradition Act mandates the Justice Minister must refuse to extradite if it appears that the criminal prosecution, no matter how valid, is politically motivated. It also requires the Justice Minister to refuse extradition if the defendant would face unjust or oppressive penalties. As for U.S. authorities, I can only presume they are intimately familiar with our extradition laws, and that's where the challenge for sovereignty lies. D.E.A. administrator Karen Tandy effectively thumbed her nose at Canada when she publicly confirmed that Marc's arrest was a political act: "a significant blow-to the marijuana legalization movement. Drug legalization lobbyists now have one less pot of money to rely on." In the United States political funding is deemed to be so important it is legally equivalent to free speech. If Justice Minister Irwin Cottler abides by the Extradition Act Mr. Emery will never be sent for trial in Seattle. But if our government does extradite Mr. Emery our sovereign ability to resist foreign control of Canada's politics, laws and institutions will have been greatly diminished. His legal battle will likely take years, but in the meantime let the Justice Minister know that you want him to uphold the Extradition Act for Canada's sake, and to resist U.S. attempts to interfere in our domestic politics. This is important, because it will be precedent setting. Michael Clarke globaldemocracyproject.ca Sardis - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin