Pubdate: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 Source: Providence Journal, The (RI) Copyright: 2005 The Providence Journal Company Contact: http://www.projo.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/352 Author: Robert Sharpe Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v05/n1391/a02.html Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?115 (Cannabis - California) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine) FOCUS ON METH, NOT MARIJUANA M.J. Andersen's Aug. 26 column ("U.S. drug policy a childish pursuit") was right on target. While local governments are struggling with a methamphetamine epidemic, the Office of National Drug Control Policy is spending millions on a Reefer Madness-revisited ad campaign. This reflects a bizarre sense of priorities. A National Association of Counties survey found that the vast majority of county officials report that methamphetamine is the biggest drug problem. Local law enforcement is where the rubber meets the road -- these are the public-safety professionals who deal with drug offenses on a daily basis, and it's not marijuana that concerns them, but, rather, meth. Meanwhile, an out-of-touch federal government continues to be obsessed with marijuana, even going so far as to prosecute California patients who use medical marijuana for relief. The biggest lie to come out of the Office of National Drug Control Policy is that new, potent strains of marijuana allegedly make pot a far more dangerous drug than before. This is nonsense. The only difference between weak and strong marijuana is that the strong kind requires significantly less smoke inhalation to produce the desired effect. So it's actually less harmful. The tax dollars wasted on the Office of National Drug Control Policy's misleading anti-marijuana campaign would be better spent on treatment for methamphetamine addicts. ROBERT SHARPE Washington The writer is policy analyst for the advocacy group Common Sense for Drug Policy. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom