Pubdate: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 Source: Crimson White, The (Edu, Univ of Alabama) Copyright: 2005 The Crimson White. Contact: http://www.cw.ua.edu/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2451 Author: Matthew Abbey, Contributing Writer Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) FORUM MARKS CONSTITUTION DAY Experts Talk Medical Marijuana, Seizure Of Property Members of the UA community discussed medicinal marijuana and the seizure of private property Friday in observance of the first annual Constitution Day, which is intended to spark discussion about the United States' charter. Congress mandated that institutes of higher education commemorate Sept. 10, the day the Constitution was signed, though the type of event is left to the discretion of each institute. Vijaya Sundar, chairwoman of the UA department of internal medicine, began the forum with a discussion about the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes. Sundar did not advocate or oppose the rehabilitive or somatic use of marijuana, but she did say that the federal stranglehold on research could hamper the beneficial effects of the drug. "Marijuana has been used for 4,000 years for the treatment of illness. There are definite indications that cannabinoids can be used for medical treatment purposes," Sundar said. Cannabinoids have been used in the past because there was not a broad spectrum of medicines to use to alleviate or treat illness, Sundar said. Marijuana should be used as a last option, if at all, in the modern drug environment because there are many alternatives, she said. Opiates are commonly used to nullify pain, Sundar said. Norvin Richards, a UA philosophy professor, talked about governmental seizure of property. Discussion about the issue has increased since the U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 decision to uphold the eminent domain seizure of property in New London, Conn., for private economic development. Richards said the debate arising from the situation in New London was controversial primarily because of a lack of understanding and media grandstanding. Richards said it seems the Supreme Court upheld the Constitution without bias. "The Court transcends individuals," he said. "Personal morals should not be involved in their decisions." The town of New London condemned property in an economically blighted area to establish housing, office buildings and a marina near a new Pfizer plant. This court was charged to interpret the language of the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits the seizure of property by government except for public use and must provide just compensation, Richards said. He said the discussed centers around the true value of the property and the phrases "public use" and "just compensation." The implications of the language "public use" clearly encompasses stimulating the economy and creating jobs, Richards said. - --- MAP posted-by: Elizabeth Wehrman