Pubdate: Mon, 19 Sep 2005
Source: Day, The (CT)
Copyright: 2005 The Day Publishing Co.
Contact:  http://www.theday.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/293
Author: Froma Harrop
Cited: Students for Sensible Drug Policy http://www.daregeneration.com
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hea.htm (Higher Education Act)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?225 (Students - United States)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?219 (Students for Sensible Drug Policy)

HYPOCRISY A BAD DRUG

During the 2000 presidential campaign, George W. Bush was asked
whether he had ever tried cocaine. His answer was that he hadn't used
drugs for 25 years. I take that as a "Yes."

That same year, Lincoln Chafee was running for the U.S. Senate from
Rhode Island and was asked the same question. He gave a more
forthright response, admitting that he had sniffed coke while a
student at Brown University.

Possession of cocaine, a felony, did not interfere with either
politician's Ivy League education. Nor did it stop them from seeking
and attaining high public office. Today, taxpayers cover both men's
salaries and health-care costs, and will eventually provide their
government pensions. All, apparently, is forgiven.

But when some low-income kid gets convicted of smoking a joint (a
misdemeanor), America gathers up its moral indignation and strips him
of his federal student loan. This is a sick double-standard, and it
will continue unless changes are made in the Higher Education Act.

Congress is now reauthorizing the 40-year-old law, which was created
to help students pay for college. The aid comes in the form of grants,
student loans and work-study programs. In 1998, Congress added the
Drug Provision, which bars students ever convicted of the sale or
possession of illegal drugs from participating in the program.

There's an effort in Congress to lessen the Drug Provision's burden on
poor and working-class students. But anything less than its total
elimination tramples the American ideal of equal opportunity.

Student Aid Lost

As things now stand, police swoop down on some college party and drag
off the pot-smoking kids. Come the next semester, rich daddies write
the usual checks, and the children of doctors, lawyers and U.S.
presidents are back in class. Poor and working-class students go home.
So far, 175,000 young people have lost federal student aid because of
the Drug Provision.

The whole War on Drugs is a lesson in class discrimination. "A ton of
drugs are taken by middle-class kids," says Tom Angell, a director of
Students for Sensible Drug Policy. "Middle- and upper-class people
often don't get caught. And they can afford good lawyers to avoid a
conviction in the first place."

A possible case in point is Mitchell Daniels, Republican governor of
Indiana. As a student at Princeton, Daniels was charged with the
possession not only of marijuana, but also of LSD. He was never
actually convicted, but did plead guilty to a disorderly conduct
charge for smoking pot. He paid a fine, and his studies continued.

During the campaign for Indiana governor, Daniels' rival, Democratic
incumbent Joe Kernan, admitted to smoking pot while in his 20s. And so
it goes. These examples barely scratch the surface on the histories of
illicit drug use by our political leaders.

The "war" is also racist. Seventy-two percent of all drug users are
non-Hispanic whites, according to government numbers. Blacks account
for only 13 percent of the population and 15 percent of the illicit
drug users. But they are 57 percent of the inmates doing time in state
prisons for drug offenses.

The Drug Provision was the handiwork of Rep. Mark Souder, an Indiana
Republican. Its intention was to deter young people from taking drugs.
In practice, it deters poor people from getting a college education.
Would someone please explain how denying poor kids the money for
college is going to save them?

The House version of the revised Higher Education Act leaves the drug
conviction question on the financial-aid application, but removes
punishment for drug convictions before college. In other words,
high-school students caught smoking pot in a park would no longer have
their futures ruined. But that still would happen if a student is
convicted while in college and receiving assistance.

In the Senate bill, students would not be grilled about convictions
for possessing drugs, either in high school or while getting aid. But
they would nevertheless be asked about convictions for selling drugs.

Here's the War on Drugs in action. Without shame, the political elites
hunt for ways to make examples of lower-income people for doing what
they did. Given the society-wide use of illegal substances and uneven
application of drug laws, singling out poor students for special
punishment is, excuse the expression, hypocrisy on speed.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake