Pubdate: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 Source: Watauga Democrat (NC) Copyright: 2005 Watauga Democrat Newspapers, Inc. Contact: http://www.wataugademocrat.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2322 Author: Jerry Sena Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine) OPINIONS VARY ON PRECURSOR LAW North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley signed into law a bill last week that will move popular cold medicines such as Sudafed off retail aisles and behind the pharmacy counters beginning next year -- in an attempt to curtail the manufacture of methamphetamine. Tonya Cable, front manager at Boone Drug New Market Centre, stocks Sudafed on the shelves Wednesday. Photo by Mark Mitchell But the bill, modeled after a law passed by Oklahoma legislators in April 2004, has received criticism from retailers for punishing legitimate consumers while leaving meth users largely untouched. Dr. David Work, executive director of North Carolina Board of Pharmacy, said the new law will add red tape to the daily duties of pharmacists, but was unequivocal when asked if the restrictions would slow criminals. "No. It's going to make things more difficult for the pharmacists," he said. "They put all these legal hoops out there for the pharmacists and legitimate customers to jump through. They can get this drug in the mail so easily; I can't see how this law is going to affect the illegal users much at all." Beginning Jan. 15, customers will be required to show a photo ID, be at least 18 years old, and sign a log to purchase tablets containing ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, a decongestant used in the nearly 100 cold medicines currently available on the market. Individuals will also need a prescription to buy more than two packages in one purchase, or three in any 30-day period. Retailers who violate the rules can be fined $500 for a first offense. Stores without pharmacies will not be allowed to sell the restricted drugs at all. Boone Drug, Inc. co-owner Johnny Stacy said he was awaiting word from the Board of Pharmacy before putting controls in place at the company's 11 locations. "We haven't seen the law in its final form yet," Stacy said. "We haven't heard from the Board of Pharmacy. We have to decide what's going to work best and what's required." Work said the board would be communicating soon with its member pharmacies. "We'll be sending an e-mail out to all the pharmacists in the state advising them of the new rules." Fran Preston, president of the North Carolina Retail Merchants Association, has said she will press state officials to make training guidelines available to affected merchants within a month. The new state law does not affect the availability of gel or liquid capsules. Liquid forms of the medicines are more difficult to convert to meth than the tablets, which use a relatively simple process to dissolve the powder binding agent. Stacy said there is no appreciable difference between the liquid cold medicines and those in tablet form. If North Carolina retailers remain skeptical of the law's effectiveness, Oklahomans have had a year and a half to assess the successes and failures of the new restrictions, which have become a model for a growing number of states looking for a way to stem the growth of clandestine meth labs around the country. Nationwide, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) seized 9,797 meth labs last year compared with 162 in 1995. The National Association of Counties released a survey this summer of 500 law-enforcement agencies and found that 87 percent reported an increase in meth-related arrests in the past three years. Sixty percent of county sheriffs said meth is now their main drug problem, linking it to increases in robberies, domestic violence, assaults, identity thefts, and child neglect. Oklahoma has seen an 80 percent reduction in clandestine labs and precursor chemical dump sites -- from an average of 105 to 19 per month -- since enacting the new rules. A DEA spokesman has said it would wait to see if the numbers stabilize before making any recommendations to the Bush administration, which has placed marijuana at the top of its drug-war priorities. Watauga County Sheriff Mark Shook was pleased North Carolina had followed the lead of states like Oklahoma, calling the restrictions "a tried and true law" likely to make it harder on illicit cooks. "I think it's great. It's been needed for awhile and we've been going down to Raleigh trying to get it passed," Shook said. Shook has been a leading advocate for tougher sentencing and beefed up enforcement against meth producers since his election in 2002. His efforts, and those of the Northwestern North Carolina Methamphetamine Task Force he helped create in 2004, have contributed to Watauga County's transformation from worst meth record in the state to most improved. With three months left in the year, Shook said law enforcement has found only 13 clandestine labs or dump sites in the county so far. During the past two years the county accounted for 43 labs and dumpsites -- tops in the state for 2003 and good enough for third last year. And much of the meth-making activity has been isolated to two areas of the county, Shook said, adding that the decreased activity has freed his officers to concentrate on other areas of drug enforcement. "We've been able to look at other sources of meth, like trafficking," Shook said. "We're also getting more tips on crack cocaine, cocaine, and marijuana." Though concern for meth abuse has been rising in recent years, meth users are still outnumbered by those of marijuana, cocaine and heroin. A great deal of that concern comes from the proliferation of mom-and-pop drug labs which use common but volatile and highly toxic household chemicals endangering children, neighbors, law enforcement officers, emergency responders such as firefighters and paramedics, and the meth cooks themselves. - ---