Pubdate: Fri, 14 Oct 2005
Source: Gonzaga Bulletin, The (US WA EDU)
Copyright: 2005 The Gonzaga Bulletin
Contact:  http://www.gonzagabulletin.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3963
Author: Tom Angell
Note: Tom Angell is campaign director of Students for Sensible Drug Policy.
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/dare.htm (D.A.R.E.)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/youth.htm (Youth)

DRUG CONVICTIONS STOP FEDERAL FUNDING

As college students around the country prepare for this semester's 
midterms, thousands of their would-be classmates don't have anything to 
study for because of a federal law that strips financial aid from people 
with drug convictions.

The policy is currently being reconsidered as Congress renews the Higher 
Education Act (HEA) for the first time in seven years. While the HEA was 
originally enacted in 1965 to make higher education more accessible and 
affordable for all Americans, the Drug Provision - added during the 1998 
HEA reauthorization - is an unjustifiable roadblock in the path to college. 
Over the past seven years, more than 175,000 students have lost their 
financial aid because of the HEA Drug Provision.

Every student affected by this law has already gone through the courts. 
Taking away their financial aid punishes them twice for the same crime. 
Drug crimes are the only infractions that students lose aid for - murderers 
and rapists are still eligible. And because of racial profiling and the 
discriminatory enforcement of drug laws, the policy disproportionately 
keeps people of color out of college.

Last month Congress own researchers at the Government Accountability Office 
were unable to find any evidence the provision actually reduces drug abuse. 
In fact, other federal studies show that high school graduates not 
attending college are far more likely to use drugs than those in college.

Besides worsening our nation's drug problems and victimizing students who 
are trying to turn their lives around with a college education, this law 
hurts America's economic productivity and makes our streets more dangerous.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, college graduates earn 62 percent more 
each year and $1 million more over lifetimes than people with only high 
school diplomas. College graduates pay twice as much federal income tax 
than high school graduates. The revenue-slashing aid ban is unacceptable in 
a time of budget shortfalls.

And the law does more than hurt revenue; it drives up public spending. 
Educated people are less likely to rely on costly social programs like 
welfare, food stamps and public housing. Budget hawks should be outraged 
that this provision prevents people from pulling themselves up by their 
bootstraps and becoming productive taxpaying citizens.

College graduates are also less likely to break the law and become costly 
drains on the criminal justice system. People with only high school 
diplomas are 12 times more likely to be incarcerated than college 
graduates. Jailing one prisoner costs $26,000 per year.

We should encourage people who have been in trouble with drugs to move 
beyond their past mistakes, but the HEA Drug Provision prevents them from 
getting their lives back on track. Graduating more college students means 
greater economic productivity and increased tax revenue, while locking up 
more inmates means taxpayers must pay for skyrocketing prison costs. 
Keeping this policy on the books is fiscally irresponsible.

One pending proposal to scale back the law would help some students get 
back into school but would leave thousands behind. The minor change would 
stop the provision from affecting people with convictions in the past, but 
students busted while in school would continue to lose their aid, leaving 
the fundamental problems with the law unaddressed.

Since there are already minimum grade requirements for receiving aid, the 
partially reformed Drug Provision would still only affect students doing 
well in classes. Good students would continue to be removed from school for 
minor convictions, many never returning to finish their degrees. The 
Department of Education reports that more than a third of students leaving 
college before beginning their second year don't return within five years.

Partially reforming this fundamentally flawed law is like slapping a 
band-aid on a gaping wound. Lawmakers should fully repeal the Drug 
Provision and reinstate aid to all qualified individuals who want to earn a 
college education.

Students who realize this policy is counterproductive and discriminatory 
should contact Students for Sensible Drug Policy and get involved in 
efforts to take Drug War politics out of education.

For more information, log on to www.DAREgeneration.com or call (202) 
293-4414. More than 120 student governments have passed resolutions calling 
on Congress to repeal the Drug Provision. What will you do to help overturn 
this law?

It could be another seven years before Congress restructures the Higher 
Education Act again. Concerned students and educators should urge their 
legislators to take the lead in helping young people stay in school where 
they belong. If Congress doesn't act now, another 175,000 students could 
have the doors to education slammed shut in their faces.

Tom Angell is campaign director of Students for Sensible Drug Policy.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D