Pubdate: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 Source: Daily Campus, The (UConn, CT Edu) Copyright: 2005 ThesDaily Campus Contact: http://www.dailycampus.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2778 Author: Andrew Porter Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?219 (Students for Sensible Drug Policy) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hea.htm (Higher Education Act) US CT: EDU: PROVISION OF HIGHER ED. ACT UNDER REVIEW Provision of Higher Ed. Act Under Review A specific provision of the Higher Education Act, which is being re-examined by Congress this year, has come into question because of the restrictions it places on the ability of students to get Federal Financial Aid for secondary education if they have had a drug conviction. According to the current form of the Higher Education Act, anyone applying for federal aid with the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) must answer Question 31 which states, "Has the student ever been convicted of possessing or selling illegal drugs?" and goes on to clarify with the following information, "A federal law suspends federal student aid eligibility for students convicted under federal or state law for possession of or sale of illegal drugs (not including alcohol and tobacco). If the answer to this question is 'Yes,' you will be taken to the Question 31 Worksheet to help you determine whether this law affects the student's eligibility for federal student aid. Count only federal or state convictions. Do not count convictions that have been removed from his/her record. Do not count convictions that occurred before the student turned 18, unless he/she was tried as an adult." Under the current Higher Education Act, any applicant that answers yes to Question 31 will automatically be denied any federal loan for secondary education, including Pell Grants and Stafford Student Loans. In September 2005, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report on Federal Drug Policy that examined the Higher Education Act. It found that 0.3 percent of all applicants responded yes to Question 31 on the 2003-2004 FAFSA form and as a result were ineligible to receive federal aid. The report also stated that the 2003-2004 FAFSA form resulted in 18,000 students being denied $45 million dollars in Pell Grants and 29,000 students being denied between $100 to $120 million in student loans. The GAO report also stated that although some officials at the Office of National Drug Control and Prevention have stated that the Higher Education Act may help deter drug use, the GAO was unable to find any studies that assess whether or not drug use was actually being deterred. The current Higher Education Act uses any drug conviction on an applicant's record to determine if they are eligible for aid with different punishments based on the amount of convictions. An applicant with one conviction for possession cannot obtain aid for one year, and an applicant with two convictions for possession cannot obtain aid for two years. Any applicant with three or more possession convictions would face an indefinite denial. The penalties are more severe for sale of a controlled substance, as one conviction results in a two-year denial, and two convictions result in indefinite denial. Part of the president's fiscal year 2005 budget contains a proposal, which is supported by the Office of National Drug Control and Prevention, that would only make students ineligible to receive federal loans if they were convicted for possession of a controlled substance while enrolled in higher education. Currently, the law is coming under fire from groups like Students for Sensible Drug Policy, who feel there is no sensible reason to further punish those convicted for drug use. In a press release, Students for Sensible Drug Policy cited a, "strong consensus among economists that formal education has a positive impact not only on personal income but on society." "Congress' own researches failed to show that this discriminatory law does anything to solve our nation's drug problems," said Scarlee Swerdlow, the executive director of Students for Sensible Drug Policy. "Preventing determined students from earning a college degree makes our streets less safe and undercuts America's economic productivity." "Occasionally students will answer the question in error," said UConn Director of Student Financial Aid Services Jean Main, "They will give an error that indicates they're not eligible, [Student Financial Aid Services] will send them a letter saying, Did you answer this question in error? and based on that if they did answer it in error the student will correct their mistake and that makes them eligible." Main said that out of the over 30,000 FAFSA applications received by UConn, only three were ultimately not received with a response allowing the applicant to be eligible for aid. According to Main, UConn scholarships also follow the federal guidelines, so any applicant who disqualifies themselves on the FAFSA form would be ineligible to receive a UConn scholarship. According to the FAFSA application, anyone who provides misleading information in an attempt to get financial aid could be fined up to $20,000 and subject to jail time. Main said, "Background checks are not conducted as part of the FAFSA application." - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom