Pubdate: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 Source: National Post (Canada) Copyright: 2005 Southam Inc. Contact: http://www.nationalpost.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/286 Author: Charles Mandel, CanWest News Service MARIJUANA MESSAGE PASSING YOUNG MOTORISTS BY, SURVEY FINDS 15% Of Youngsters Surveyed For Study 'Toked' And Drove Education campaigns aimed at drinking and driving may be reaching teens, but are less effective when it comes to drug-impaired driving. A new study finds teens are more likely to drive after smoking marijuana than after drinking, according to a recent study of 6,000 Atlantic Canadians in Grades 10 and 12. Fifteen per cent of the 15-and-18-year-olds surveyed drove under the influence of cannabis last year, compared with 12% who drove after drinking, says a study published in the journal Accident Analysis and Prevention. Drivers who had smoked marijuana were four times more likely to be involved in an accident than those who had not. The study's results are considered accurate within 1.6 percentage points, 99 times out of 100. "While we seem to be doing a pretty good job of letting young people know that alcohol and driving don't mix, they don't seem to be getting the same message with respects to other drugs," said Mark Asbridge, co-author of the study and an assistant professor in community health and epidemiology at Halifax's Dalhousie University. The study arrives just as health agencies and not-for-profit groups are starting to put a new emphasis on driving-and-drugs education programs and as the federal government's Bill C-16 -- aimed at amending the Criminal Code on drug-impaired driving -- is in second reading. The study, by Mr. Asbridge with Christiane Poulin and Andrea Donato, found the students surveyed more commonly drank (62.6%) than toked (33.6%). "Consumption of alcohol is still higher than the consumption of cannabis, which is really the interesting twist," Mr. Asbridge said. "We can suggest that the fact cannabis now succeeds alcohol in terms of driving while impaired, based on these adolescents, the message is getting lost somewhere." While it could be inferred the kids are experiencing more car accidents because of marijuana use, Mr. Asbridge said another argument is that kids who drive under the influence of cannabis also engage in other risky behaviours, such as driving without a licence and using fake ID to buy liquor, as well as driving after drinking. "There seems to be small subgroups of kids, typically young males, who are all doing all of these behaviours, not necessarily all at the same time," Mr. Asbridge said. The study based its results on teens who toked one hour before driving. Students who held a licence for more than one year were at greatest risk for an accident. Mr. Asbridge suggested law enforcement agencies, educators and organizations such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) are not sending out strong enough messages about drugs and driving. He said MADD "does fantastic work with alcohol, but are only starting to get into the drug business." In the late summer, MADD launched a campaign targeting drug-impaired driving aimed at high school and post-secondary students. "The drugs are popular with the kids, the marijuana is popular with the students, and they do think it's okay to toke and drive. It's quite a concern for us." said Karen Dunham, president of MADD. "We do find a lot of young Canadians just don't get it. If you're high, don't drive." In late November the Canadian Public Health Association will launch its Cannabis and Driving Project, a campaign aimed at teens age 14 to 18. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman