Pubdate: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 Source: Kingsport Times-News (TN) Copyright: 2005 Kingsport Publishing Corporation Contact: http://gotricities.net/domains/timesnews.net/lettertoEditor.dna?action=new Website: http://www.timesnews.net/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1437 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm (Opinion) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/heroin.htm (Heroin) DECRIMINALIZING DRUGS WOULD BE MAJOR MISTAKE It is frequently claimed that the war on drugs, like America's failed experiment in prohibition in the early 20th century, is misguided, unwise and unwinnable and that those who use illicit drugs chiefly harm themselves. Society would be better served, the argument goes, if such activities were largely decriminalized. And yet the recent shooting deaths of two men in downtown Kingsport provide a vivid and timely example of the insidious nexus of drugs and violence that society ignores at its collective peril. Jeffrin L. Nolan, 27, of Quail Ridge Road, Johnson City, the owner of Sole, a candle and incense shop, and Terrence D. Alexander, 21, of Leland Drive, Kingsport, both arrested earlier this year on separate drug charges, were found in a backroom of the downtown business with gunshots to their heads. Nolan was pronounced dead at the scene; Alexander died two days later at Holston Valley Medical Center. One of two double-murder suspects, Osheene Deyoung "Rah" Massey, 24, was captured last week in Carter County. His alleged accomplice, Octavia Patrice Brooks, 23, who lived with Massey in Piney Flats, is still being sought by police. Investigators note that Nolan was arrested this past summer for selling cocaine and Alexander was arrested during a traffic stop in August for possession of cocaine. Those who advocate decriminalizing drug use point to the vast amount of money expended in the cause of prosecuting and incarcerating individuals that they argue could be better spent on drug treatment. While addicts certainly need - and receive - treatment, it is dangerously naive, even illogical, to believe that most addicts will not engage in yet other forms of criminal behavior to feed that addiction. Police in any community know that a significant share of all crimes are ultimately traceable - either directly or indirectly - to illicit drugs. In most metropolitan areas the bulk of property crimes ranging from purse-snatching to home burglaries and shoplifting are perpetrated by addicts desperate to finance their drug habits. Similarly, drug addiction is often the unseen impetus behind prostitution, robbery and murder. While critics often claim that the war on drugs has been a largely futile one, statistics belie that assertion. Government studies show that illegal drug use peaked in America in 1979 and has declined by more than 46 percent since. Over that same period, use of alcohol - a legally available drug - has only declined one percent. Indeed, such a comparison amply demonstrates the obvious efficacy of the oft-derided prohibition paradigm. If cocaine and heroin had been decriminalized a quarter of a century ago, the number of addicts presently in its thrall - and consequently the crime that followed in its wake - would have risen exponentially, rather than decline as Justice Department figures show. High levels of illicit drug use go hand in hand with higher crime levels generally. Seeking out this animating cause of a significant share of crime is not an easy task, as area law enforcement knows only too well. Doing so in spite of the difficulties, however, is not only prudent, but imperative. - --- MAP posted-by: Steve Heath