Pubdate: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 Source: Province, The (CN BC) Copyright: 2005 The Province Contact: http://www.canada.com/vancouver/theprovince/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/476 Author: Jack Keating Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine) DRUG-TRAFFICKING CHARGE DISMISSED OVER POLICE ARREST TACTICS 'Ends Do Not Always Justify Means,' Judge Says Of Cocaine Bust Drug-trafficking charges against a Vancouver man found with 24 kilograms of cocaine have been dismissed because of "planned and deliberate" Charter violations by Vancouver police. Provincial Court Judge Catherine Bruce excluded the evidence against Shu Hua Zhou, 35, because of flagrant violations of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms against arbitrary detention, unreasonable search and seizure and lying about the reason for detention. The charges were laid after an officer was tipped off by a VIA Rail employee, who had received some training in what to look for in a suspected drug courier, that two passengers had bought tickets to Toronto with cash and would be staying in a private compartment. Const. Glenn Thordarson and drug-squad members subsequently detained the two men as they were about to board a VIA train in Vancouver on Jan. 3, 2003. The men were told their suitcases would be searched because of "increased concerns for security after 9/11." The cocaine, wrapped in 24 packages and worth about $35,000, was found and seized. "Before the arbitrary detention, the police had no idea if there were drugs in the accused's luggage," Bruce said in her written judgment. "The ends do not always justify the means. "The police simply cannot detain any traveller they wish, regardless of the grounds for doing so. The court cannot condone this cavalier approach to the rights of the accused." Bruce noted that, since it takes three days to reach Toronto, "the purchase of bedroom accommodation is entirely understandable and not the least bit unusual." A second man charged in the case, Seak Fai Wong, 56, of Richmond has since died of cancer. "The fact the accused and Mr. Wong booked private accommodation does little to raise a suspicion that they were transporting drugs," said Bruce. After detaining them, Const. Ian Thurber used the "ruse" of a security check to search the luggage. "At no time was the accused told he was under investigation for drugs," said Bruce. "Moreover, the breach of the accused's rights . . . was planned and deliberate. The officers purposely provided a false reason for the detention to further their investigation." Const. Doug Brown conceded "there were no grounds to detain for a drug investigation and thus he chose to detain for security concerns . . ." "The police action in this case, based solely on a hunch, cannot deprive the accused of the expectation of privacy he had in his luggage, even in a public train station," the judge said. Defence lawyer Chris Johnson applauded the decision. "It was just an incredibly incompetent police investigation," he said. "This is a huge amount of drugs. And the police investigated it in the same fashion as they might a rock of cocaine at Hastings and Main. It was kind of stunning that they would do that." Const. Howard Chow said the police department is studying the judgment. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth