Pubdate: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 Source: Burlington Times-News (NC) Copyright: 2005 The Times-News Publishing Company Contact: http://www.thetimesnews.com/letter_to_editor/splash.php Website: http://www.thetimesnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1822 ANTI-METH ID REQUIREMENT IS PROBLEMATIC Methamphetamine is one of the top illegal drugs contributing to violent crime in the U.S., with many other nonviolent crimes such as robbery and theft traced back to meth use, including identity theft. Complicating this troubling issue is the fact that the main ingredient in meth is found - in much smaller doses, of course - in some over-the-counter cold medicines, specifically those that contain the decongestant pseudoephedrine. It is combined in meth labs in a toxic chemical cocktail to create the drug. There's nothing preventing someone from walking into a drug store and buying all the Sudafed on the shelves, but that may be about to change in a bill requiring that medications containing any amount of pseudoephedrine in non-liquid form be sold from behind the pharmacy counter. It would also require the pharmacist to maintain a record of the purchaser's name and identification. When a similar law was passed in Oklahoma, that state experienced a more than 70 percent decrease in meth lab seizures. Restricting the sale of these medications makes sense, and it should be noted that some stores already voluntarily limit the amount of cold remedies containing pseudoephedrine that customers may purchase on each visit. But requiring ID for such purposes should be carefully scrutinized for unintended consequences. While it sounds good on paper, it may in fact increase the already exploding identity theft problem. Drug addicts will do anything for their next fix. Creating a fake ID from stolen information is easy to do. Unless the pharmacy records are tied together electronically, that ID can be recycled through Target, Wal-Mart and many other pharmacies in town. Then again, developing a government-controlled data bank of citizens purchasing perfectly legal cold medicines also is problematic: At what point does an innocent householder who just happens to be stocking up in preparation for the cold and flu season become a suspect? Putting the cold medicine behind the pharmacy counter and restricting the amount that can be purchased is a good idea. So is toughening and vigorously enforcing the law against meth production and sale; penalties should be especially harsh for those who expose children to the hazardous chemicals involved in making meth. But requiring ID is going too far. If the meth problem becomes increasingly severe, it may at some point be in the public's best interests to require prescriptions for some of these medicines. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth